Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 9157320" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😮" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f62e.png" title="Face with open mouth&nbsp; &nbsp; :open_mouth:" data-shortname=":open_mouth:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /> We must be playing different games. The fighter is at best a little better with weapons than any other warrior. If the fighter is the Olympian, then the comparison is to a collegiate star athlete. Both are competitive runners, not someone who runs sometimes. But the fighter isn’t a Runner. They’re a “fit athlete” in a game with classes that are as specific as Runner. I agree with most of this. It’s just the first point I completely disagree with. The Warlock class has just as much mechanical distinction as thematic. If someone wants to play a Mage, but the Wizard just doesn’t feel like what they want from a Mage, and Tome Warlock does, I’m gonna let them use Int and flavor the abilities however they want, ya know? Why not?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 9157320, member: 6704184"] 😮 We must be playing different games. The fighter is at best a little better with weapons than any other warrior. If the fighter is the Olympian, then the comparison is to a collegiate star athlete. Both are competitive runners, not someone who runs sometimes. But the fighter isn’t a Runner. They’re a “fit athlete” in a game with classes that [I]are[/I] as specific as Runner. I agree with most of this. It’s just the first point I completely disagree with. The Warlock class has just as much mechanical distinction as thematic. If someone wants to play a Mage, but the Wizard just doesn’t feel like what they want from a Mage, and Tome Warlock does, I’m gonna let them use Int and flavor the abilities however they want, ya know? Why not? [/QUOTE]

Verification