This is a high level 3.5E campaign that is in the process of finishing up after about 2 years of gaming.
One of my players is a human sorcerer. Part of his background is that he is the 4th son of a minor noble, and something of the prodigal son in that he took up sorcery instead of learning diplomacy & becoming knights/warriors/fighters like his older brothers and his father and uncles. As part of his being a noble from close to a nation that is aggressively anti-elf and anti-anything not human, he has played his character as somewhat snooty & condescending, especially towards the non-humans in the group. However, its been more words than actual action, though. In action, he has been a valuable party member.
His family is a bit different, though,
The party met the sorcerer's more open-minded younger brother earlier in the campaign - he was pretty accepting of elves, dwarves, etc. I had hinted that the sorcerer's father holds a similar view to the group sorcerer (elves and such are okay - as long as they keep to themselves...) However, I also said at the time that the hot-tempered eldest brother in the family holds more extreme views on non-humans and outsiders that were in-line with a follower of an evil racial purity deity (The Emperor of Scorn) the party met a while back in game. The eldest brother is obviously the one that is in line to inherit the family estate.
Coming up soon in the campaign, the party will need to help save the elven kingdom from a crusade started by the Emperor of Scorn. This happened because the drow & some of their allies had captured some good elves, then raided some human villages near the elf lands & conveniently executed the captured good elves & left the dead elf bodies in the raided towns as evidence the "good" elves did it...thus inciting even greater ire among the humans towards the elf kingdom, leading to the crusade.
The crusade is being led by a former human, now a Death Knight, and the brother of the group sorcerer, who is a raging barbarian/berserker type warrior.
Upon confronting the party, would this raging & hateful racist attempt to attack:
a) the party non-humans first (the elf paladin/Champion of Corellon from the elf kingdom, the halfling psion, the goliath barbarian & the dwarf fighter)?
b) Or would he attack his brother because he has been associating with these impure non humans, and his impurity must be purged?
c) Or, would he maybe attack another human party member (the human rogue or human cleric of ta nature goddess?) in an attempt to strike out their impurity first and hope his brother is turned to his point of view?
I would think he would strike down either the elf or his brother first, but I'm not sure.
Thanks for any input.
One of my players is a human sorcerer. Part of his background is that he is the 4th son of a minor noble, and something of the prodigal son in that he took up sorcery instead of learning diplomacy & becoming knights/warriors/fighters like his older brothers and his father and uncles. As part of his being a noble from close to a nation that is aggressively anti-elf and anti-anything not human, he has played his character as somewhat snooty & condescending, especially towards the non-humans in the group. However, its been more words than actual action, though. In action, he has been a valuable party member.
His family is a bit different, though,
The party met the sorcerer's more open-minded younger brother earlier in the campaign - he was pretty accepting of elves, dwarves, etc. I had hinted that the sorcerer's father holds a similar view to the group sorcerer (elves and such are okay - as long as they keep to themselves...) However, I also said at the time that the hot-tempered eldest brother in the family holds more extreme views on non-humans and outsiders that were in-line with a follower of an evil racial purity deity (The Emperor of Scorn) the party met a while back in game. The eldest brother is obviously the one that is in line to inherit the family estate.
Coming up soon in the campaign, the party will need to help save the elven kingdom from a crusade started by the Emperor of Scorn. This happened because the drow & some of their allies had captured some good elves, then raided some human villages near the elf lands & conveniently executed the captured good elves & left the dead elf bodies in the raided towns as evidence the "good" elves did it...thus inciting even greater ire among the humans towards the elf kingdom, leading to the crusade.
The crusade is being led by a former human, now a Death Knight, and the brother of the group sorcerer, who is a raging barbarian/berserker type warrior.
Upon confronting the party, would this raging & hateful racist attempt to attack:
a) the party non-humans first (the elf paladin/Champion of Corellon from the elf kingdom, the halfling psion, the goliath barbarian & the dwarf fighter)?
b) Or would he attack his brother because he has been associating with these impure non humans, and his impurity must be purged?
c) Or, would he maybe attack another human party member (the human rogue or human cleric of ta nature goddess?) in an attempt to strike out their impurity first and hope his brother is turned to his point of view?
I would think he would strike down either the elf or his brother first, but I'm not sure.
Thanks for any input.