Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which spellcaster should get which spellcasting system?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 5947885" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>As long as Wizards are vancian, I'm fine with whatever they come up for the others. I do not mind if other classes are also vancian, neither I mind if the Wizard is the only one.</p><p></p><p>But then, I really hope that:</p><p></p><p>a) no class gets infinite spell knowledge anymore, like 3ed clerics</p><p></p><p>b) whatever the mechanical choices, they come from the concept/fluff of the class, not just because it has to be something different or "new"</p><p></p><p></p><p>For example, the 3ed Sorcerer was already quite in sync with the concept of "inborn" magical talents, but it would be ok also if it used spell points. I have the feeling that "at wills" should be limited tho or even avoided altogether, as if the Sorcerer was inherently limited by some sort of fatigue.</p><p></p><p>For the Bard, I'd like it to go back to its old concept of "dipping" into magic, thus having the equivalent spellcasting of a (much?) lower level Wizard or Druid, using the same mechanic. Then, in addition to this, there would be his unique song-based magic. Or even better, just give it the unique music-magic, and you can then use plain and simple multiclassing if you want the Wizard-dipped or Druid-dipped version.</p><p></p><p>For the Warlock, I disagree with the AEDU... if it's like a Witch, then it sounds to me like it should be more based on rituals and magic item creation, especially potions and charms/amulets, plus a small number of spells (e.g. shapeshifting). But I think encounter-based make no sense, it's just popular because of 4e, but has no ground in the concept behind the class.</p><p></p><p>Druid and Cleric are the most difficult... I have no idea what would be the best, because I still haven't decided on how much a Cleric's spellcasting power should be directly because of her God, and how much should be her own talent, or IOW even if generally granted by the deity how much is the weight of her own talent in both the number of spells known and the concentration/casting capabilities.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 5947885, member: 1465"] As long as Wizards are vancian, I'm fine with whatever they come up for the others. I do not mind if other classes are also vancian, neither I mind if the Wizard is the only one. But then, I really hope that: a) no class gets infinite spell knowledge anymore, like 3ed clerics b) whatever the mechanical choices, they come from the concept/fluff of the class, not just because it has to be something different or "new" For example, the 3ed Sorcerer was already quite in sync with the concept of "inborn" magical talents, but it would be ok also if it used spell points. I have the feeling that "at wills" should be limited tho or even avoided altogether, as if the Sorcerer was inherently limited by some sort of fatigue. For the Bard, I'd like it to go back to its old concept of "dipping" into magic, thus having the equivalent spellcasting of a (much?) lower level Wizard or Druid, using the same mechanic. Then, in addition to this, there would be his unique song-based magic. Or even better, just give it the unique music-magic, and you can then use plain and simple multiclassing if you want the Wizard-dipped or Druid-dipped version. For the Warlock, I disagree with the AEDU... if it's like a Witch, then it sounds to me like it should be more based on rituals and magic item creation, especially potions and charms/amulets, plus a small number of spells (e.g. shapeshifting). But I think encounter-based make no sense, it's just popular because of 4e, but has no ground in the concept behind the class. Druid and Cleric are the most difficult... I have no idea what would be the best, because I still haven't decided on how much a Cleric's spellcasting power should be directly because of her God, and how much should be her own talent, or IOW even if generally granted by the deity how much is the weight of her own talent in both the number of spells known and the concentration/casting capabilities. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which spellcaster should get which spellcasting system?
Top