Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which spellcaster should get which spellcasting system?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kavon" data-source="post: 5954125" data-attributes="member: 9822"><p>In my opinion, if I have to take a class that is not the Wizard and restyle it into a Wizard to get a different-than-Vancian spellcasting system for that character, they did something wrong with the class design, since there apparently wasn't anything there for those two classes to make them unique besides their casting system.</p><p></p><p>I would prefer it if each spellcasting class has their own class features that gives them their thing, then you have a selection of different spell delivery systems to pick from, and have them be internally balanced with each other so you can use them interchangeably.</p><p></p><p>For example:</p><p>Type A: Vancian (the classic) - requires the most planning ahead (gives more of [something] to compensate)</p><p>Type B: Spontaneous (3e sorcerer style) - more flexible than A, but still tied to spell slots (gives less than A of [something] to compensate)</p><p>Type C: Spell points (older psionic) - very flexible, but still tied to a limiting system</p><p>Type D: At will + spell point enhancement (4e psionic) - basically the same as C, only you have full access to powered down versions (gives less SP than C)</p><p>Type E: At will + spell slot enhancement - similar to D, but with specific leveled spell slots (making it more similar to B)</p><p>Type F: AEDU style</p><p>Type G: Whatever else they can think of.</p><p></p><p>If this stuff stays decoupled from the actual classes, everyone can have their cake and eat it.</p><p>• Want everything to be Vancian (cause it feels right <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> )? Only allow the use of Type A.</p><p>• Don't like Vancian? Ban Type A from your game.</p><p>• Don't like spell slots? Only use the spell point types (or vice versa).</p><p>• Hate AEDU and at will casting in general? Ban Type D, E and F from your game.</p><p>• Don't care what your players are using? Let them decide which they want to use!</p><p></p><p>Am I insane for wanting this? For wanting everyone to be able to choose for themselves?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kavon, post: 5954125, member: 9822"] In my opinion, if I have to take a class that is not the Wizard and restyle it into a Wizard to get a different-than-Vancian spellcasting system for that character, they did something wrong with the class design, since there apparently wasn't anything there for those two classes to make them unique besides their casting system. I would prefer it if each spellcasting class has their own class features that gives them their thing, then you have a selection of different spell delivery systems to pick from, and have them be internally balanced with each other so you can use them interchangeably. For example: Type A: Vancian (the classic) - requires the most planning ahead (gives more of [something] to compensate) Type B: Spontaneous (3e sorcerer style) - more flexible than A, but still tied to spell slots (gives less than A of [something] to compensate) Type C: Spell points (older psionic) - very flexible, but still tied to a limiting system Type D: At will + spell point enhancement (4e psionic) - basically the same as C, only you have full access to powered down versions (gives less SP than C) Type E: At will + spell slot enhancement - similar to D, but with specific leveled spell slots (making it more similar to B) Type F: AEDU style Type G: Whatever else they can think of. If this stuff stays decoupled from the actual classes, everyone can have their cake and eat it. • Want everything to be Vancian (cause it feels right ;) )? Only allow the use of Type A. • Don't like Vancian? Ban Type A from your game. • Don't like spell slots? Only use the spell point types (or vice versa). • Hate AEDU and at will casting in general? Ban Type D, E and F from your game. • Don't care what your players are using? Let them decide which they want to use! Am I insane for wanting this? For wanting everyone to be able to choose for themselves? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Which spellcaster should get which spellcasting system?
Top