Leif
Adventurer
Holding the charge
This just came up for real! Renau1g, Kinem, in his Master of the Desert Nomads game made this ruling in reference to your character:
[sblock=Kinem's Ruling, NOT MINE]"renau1g, if you cast another spell, you can no longer hold the charge of a touch spell. This applies to your familiar holding a charge for you as well. Rajah would have known this so I will say that you did not go through with that plan." [/sblock]
Well, I don't think that I like that at all! Anybody want to try saying that you can cast another spell, while your familiar is holding the charge of a different spell, with neither spell lost? I agree with Kinem that if you are holding a charge yourself and cast a separate spell, then th held charge is lost, but using a familiar to deliver the held charge seems like a perfect solution and an excellent reason to have a familiar. Opinions?
This just came up for real! Renau1g, Kinem, in his Master of the Desert Nomads game made this ruling in reference to your character:
[sblock=Kinem's Ruling, NOT MINE]"renau1g, if you cast another spell, you can no longer hold the charge of a touch spell. This applies to your familiar holding a charge for you as well. Rajah would have known this so I will say that you did not go through with that plan." [/sblock]
Well, I don't think that I like that at all! Anybody want to try saying that you can cast another spell, while your familiar is holding the charge of a different spell, with neither spell lost? I agree with Kinem that if you are holding a charge yourself and cast a separate spell, then th held charge is lost, but using a familiar to deliver the held charge seems like a perfect solution and an excellent reason to have a familiar. Opinions?