Actually, there's something about your players' strategy that shouldn't have worked:mwaite said:Here is the situation: The players are being attacked by a pack of goblin worg riders. The PCs climb the nearest tree and start shooting their crossbows down at the goblins. The goblins respond by dismounting and returning fire with their crossbows, while letting their worgs climb the tree for an attack.
Protests ensue. The players argue that worgs cannot climb trees because they lack claw attacks. Claw attacks, they reason, mean that the animal possesses enough manual dexterity to climb.
I counter by saying that anybody can climb as long as they have limbs. I am even willing to concede that creatures without claw attacks can have a penalty to their climb check, but I think it is completely unreasonable to say that they cannot climb at all.
What do you guys think?
It's not possible to shoot a crossbow at targets below you! I'm not sure if it's part of the 3E rules, but it's definitely true in real life and since your players seem to enjoy arguing about things being unrealistic...
Regarding the climbing worgs:
I think that the players' reasoning is definitely flawed. There's no connection whatsoever between the ability to climb and claw attacks.
Basically you're on your own here, you have to decide if it makes sense for worgs to be able to climb or not. I'd allow it, since the description doesn't say they can't.