Who's Playing?

[messed]

I'd just like to know who here has played Conflict?

For those of you who can't stand GMs, then this one is for you. Have started playing it just recently, but I'm liking the concept of having a game that does not need a GM for it's storytelling. GMs are limited to arbitrating the rules or getting the game going, but you have full control over the characters and whatnots.

 

[the Jester]

I haven't seen this game, but it sounds interesting.

Is there anything in the game that's inherently impossible with a dm? I've run entirely player-driven D&D games before, where the players decided the agenda, how they were pursuing it, etc.- how far beyond that does this game take the concept?

Also, is it a one-book system, a boxed set, etc- how does it work?

Thanks!

 

[Lona]

I agree with you Jester that it sounds like an interesting game. But this is a totally alien concept for me having a GM that doesn't control the games. At the very least, I think it'd be chaotic or that the storytelling would suck.

 

[messed]

Hi Lona:

Not really. The game is much more focused on the objectives. Better check it out for yourself here. Conflict Books | Store

Hi the Jester:

It's basically the same things you did, I think. Only this one is really driven by objectives so it's basically a skirmishing game that's also a RPG.

 

[Lona]

Hi Lona:

Not really. The game is much more focused on the objectives. Better check it out for yourself here. Conflict Books | Store

Hi Messed:

Forgot to thank you for pointing out this game. I went to site and bought it, and found that it was totally compatible with Pathfinder

 

[Crothian]

I'd just like to know who here has played Conflict?

For those of you who can't stand GMs, then this one is for you. Have started playing it just recently, but I'm liking the concept of having a game that does not need a GM for it's storytelling. GMs are limited to arbitrating the rules or getting the game going, but you have full control over the characters and whatnots.

So, this is for people that hate GMs but the GM is still there? Instead of the DM creating the story the players do? Having full control over the character and what he does seems to conflict with the idea that there are rules that need arbitrating.

There are games that are truly GMless, if you can't stand GMs shouldn't they play those instead?

edit: this thread is started to sound like a rehearsed ad.

 

[Reynard]

Hi Messed:

Forgot to thank you for pointing out this game. I went to site and bought it, and found that it was totally compatible with Pathfinder

*kaff*Alt*kaff*
*kaff*Shill*kaff*