Chacal
First Post
Wow ! This thread has grown big ! Thanks for all the replies and especially to Daniel for keeping "my side" of the debate alive while I was in such a long weekend.
now some reactions :
You might disagree, but IMO these base movement need errata. Would have it been more politically correct if I have asked for an errata that I knew didn't exist ?
Thanks for telling me what question I really wanted to ask.
Chacal

now some reactions :
I didn't knew that questionning the rules was out of line in this forum.If you want to house rule things that's up to you but there is a forum for lobbying for house rules and this isn't it.
You might disagree, but IMO these base movement need errata. Would have it been more politically correct if I have asked for an errata that I knew didn't exist ?
Why Is it bad only on one side of the argument ?But I think that you're mixing fantasy and real-life elements together in un-necessary and over-complicated ways.
Now this is interesting. thanks for pointing at it. This shows that it's not awfully wrong to increase movement for some dire animals.It is true that creatures usually gain 10' movement each size class but this can increase or decrease for specific monsters.
The dire shark moves 90' instead of 60' for a regular shark. Dire horses are faster than a heavy warhorse but are still the same size category.
This thread should be Why don't Dire Tigers have 50' instead of 40' moves.
Thanks for telling me what question I really wanted to ask.

Chacal