Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why are healing surges limited?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 4244892" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>Well, answer number one: If the PCs are genuinely drained after one encounter, then yes, they should rest. Running out of healing surges, or running low on them, is a good indication that you should rest.</p><p></p><p>But it should be very unlikely that the PCs will be in this situation after a single encounter! They have enough healing surges that they should be able to get through several encounters a day before feeling the crunch from healing. If they <em>are</em> regularly burning all their healing surges on the very first fight, then something is clearly wrong - either with the encounters they are facing or the characters themselves. I can see it happening every once in a while, if they end up in a really tough fight... but every day? That seems almost impossible.</p><p></p><p>Now, putting that aside, part of your argument is that it (Full Healing Surges) > (Not Full Healing Surges)... and thus, if there is no penalty for rest, a party will rest after every fight. </p><p></p><p>But consider - the same goes if they use a daily ability in the first fight, or their Action Point. Why not burn dailies right away and then rest afterwards? Logically speaking, it is always better to be completely at full than to be in any way weakened, right?</p><p></p><p>The problem is, the only way to remove that issue is to completely remove any daily abilities. Characters would have to be able to charge into every fight with absolutely the same resources available, and to entirely remove any sort of endurance mechanic from the game. Now, that could be a perfectly ok game... but would most definitely be a very, very different one. Is that what you are suggesting?</p><p></p><p>What 4E has done is severely cut back on how vital that resting is. In 3rd Edition, it was extremely easy to burn through all of your healing and powerful spells in one fight. In 4E, less so. Action points still recover every few fights, which is encouragement to keep moving. You get encounter abilities back every fight. Daily abilities are nice, but aren't so overwhelmingly beyond other abilities that they are your only available tool - in fact, your basic abilities (at will) are now solid enough to do the job when needed! And your Healing Surges should last you several fights before you feel any need to recover them.</p><p></p><p>Basically - if you are in a situation where, after every fight, your characters are feeling weak enough to need to rest, something is off. If you aren't, and you players simply really need that extra action point and daily ability... well, ok, fine. They can do so. I am confident such tables will be in the vast, vast minority - it is simply too little benefit for the boost, and most tables will be more interested in keeping things moving along. </p><p></p><p>(And, of course, there is the roleplaying elements that many have already mentioned - either plot constraints that place a sense of urgency, or simply in-character desire to keep fighting onwards, or the danger of resting in what might not be the safest spot. The counter-argument seems to be that we shouldn't consider these arguments now, since we tried to push them aside when discussing the same problems in 3rd Edition. The difference, in my opinion, is that many, many times in 3.x, it was essentially a *requirement* that you needed to rest after a fight, or you'd be walking into the next fight with several useless party members. In 4E, even if you burn your action point and all your dailies in fight number one, you will still be far from useless in the next. For most tables, that should make all the difference.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 4244892, member: 61155"] Well, answer number one: If the PCs are genuinely drained after one encounter, then yes, they should rest. Running out of healing surges, or running low on them, is a good indication that you should rest. But it should be very unlikely that the PCs will be in this situation after a single encounter! They have enough healing surges that they should be able to get through several encounters a day before feeling the crunch from healing. If they [I]are[/I] regularly burning all their healing surges on the very first fight, then something is clearly wrong - either with the encounters they are facing or the characters themselves. I can see it happening every once in a while, if they end up in a really tough fight... but every day? That seems almost impossible. Now, putting that aside, part of your argument is that it (Full Healing Surges) > (Not Full Healing Surges)... and thus, if there is no penalty for rest, a party will rest after every fight. But consider - the same goes if they use a daily ability in the first fight, or their Action Point. Why not burn dailies right away and then rest afterwards? Logically speaking, it is always better to be completely at full than to be in any way weakened, right? The problem is, the only way to remove that issue is to completely remove any daily abilities. Characters would have to be able to charge into every fight with absolutely the same resources available, and to entirely remove any sort of endurance mechanic from the game. Now, that could be a perfectly ok game... but would most definitely be a very, very different one. Is that what you are suggesting? What 4E has done is severely cut back on how vital that resting is. In 3rd Edition, it was extremely easy to burn through all of your healing and powerful spells in one fight. In 4E, less so. Action points still recover every few fights, which is encouragement to keep moving. You get encounter abilities back every fight. Daily abilities are nice, but aren't so overwhelmingly beyond other abilities that they are your only available tool - in fact, your basic abilities (at will) are now solid enough to do the job when needed! And your Healing Surges should last you several fights before you feel any need to recover them. Basically - if you are in a situation where, after every fight, your characters are feeling weak enough to need to rest, something is off. If you aren't, and you players simply really need that extra action point and daily ability... well, ok, fine. They can do so. I am confident such tables will be in the vast, vast minority - it is simply too little benefit for the boost, and most tables will be more interested in keeping things moving along. (And, of course, there is the roleplaying elements that many have already mentioned - either plot constraints that place a sense of urgency, or simply in-character desire to keep fighting onwards, or the danger of resting in what might not be the safest spot. The counter-argument seems to be that we shouldn't consider these arguments now, since we tried to push them aside when discussing the same problems in 3rd Edition. The difference, in my opinion, is that many, many times in 3.x, it was essentially a *requirement* that you needed to rest after a fight, or you'd be walking into the next fight with several useless party members. In 4E, even if you burn your action point and all your dailies in fight number one, you will still be far from useless in the next. For most tables, that should make all the difference.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why are healing surges limited?
Top