Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 8486612" data-attributes="member: 5889">You could just as easily chalk this up to simple probability and energistic theory.The Internet has lowered the energy barrier from drafting articles seen by loads of people. However, it has not dramatically changed the effort required to write &quot;high quality articles&quot;.In any chemical reaction, the reactions that require low energy predominate over reactions that require a lot of energy, to the point where the high energy reactions are generally a minority.This is reflected on the internet, where the predominance are low quality &quot;garbage&quot; articles which requires little thought or attention to write, and a minority of &quot;high quality&quot; articles that requires thought, planning, and effort.Aka the answer to the OP's question.... is science says so <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 8486612, member: 5889"] You could just as easily chalk this up to simple probability and energistic theory. The Internet has lowered the energy barrier from drafting articles seen by loads of people. However, it has not dramatically changed the effort required to write "high quality articles". In any chemical reaction, the reactions that require low energy predominate over reactions that require a lot of energy, to the point where the high energy reactions are generally a minority. This is reflected on the internet, where the predominance are low quality "garbage" articles which requires little thought or attention to write, and a minority of "high quality" articles that requires thought, planning, and effort. Aka the answer to the OP's question.... is science says so ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification