JohnSnow
Hero
Dormammu said:Some good evidence, but this is the one part I wouldn't track too literally. Pippen may well mean something like "about four feet" rather than "four feet and zero inches on the button". He could easily be like 3'10" for example, and this would alter the numbers significantly within the range you are discussing. Or converselely, perhaps 4'2"ish is what he's used to but the ent-draught already has him even bigger and then you don't have to assume he grew even more by the final portions of the book.
He's comparing heights with a human lad and I would assume he's being reasonably accurate.
Four foot two wouldn't be consistent with the claim that Pippin (and Merry) were taller than Bandobras Took, who was four foot five. So, to be taller than Bandobras, Pippin has to be taller than that.
"Concerning Hobbits" claimed that Hobbits are between two and four feet of our height (hence, "halfling"), although "now" they seldom reach more than three feet. The important thing to realize is that in this case, Tolkien's "now" is in fact "now" - the modern era. And they have "diminished." But diminished from what? In previous ages, hobbits were clearly taller. If three feet is what they reach now, what did they used to reach? It's clearly more than that, or you couldn't say they were "diminished."
Yes, it's true that most of the story's heroic hobbits were of partially fallohide extraction. But that's beside the point. The point is that Tolkien's hobbit heroes were, in fact, closer to three foot six or even three foot nine in height than they were to three feet.