Why Buy?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why buy? I'm going to buy because I believe 4e shows signs of improving the game experience, and in light of my enjoyment of 3.x the investment in three core rule books is an insignificant cost to find out for myself whether this is so. If I don't like 4e, I can always continue to play 3.5, but I'd be pretty surprised if that was my conclusion.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Kwalish Kid said:
I vote for the banhammer.

In before the lock?

Also, I love that this phrase from Something Awful has wormed its way out onto the regular internet.

Also also, I don't agree with most of the points the OP was making. Sorry. Apparently you just aren't WotC's target demographic. I, however, am.

-TRRW
 

Wow, why didn't you post this here? Let me guess your e-peen is built upon your blog stats...

Guy who wants more Blog Hits said:
Can anyone out there give me a compelling reason why I, or any other gamer of my generation for that matter, would want to buy the next version of D&D? I have no real desire to purchase a game I already own well meeting my needs, that being to tell a great long-running story to a group of friends and family on a Saturday night. It seems like a waste of money to me. I'm not a collector so why buy? I buy the books for entertainment purposes, in other words to use in crafting and improving our games. I own so much core and supplemental material now, I haven't even begun to use everything in my existing arsenal. This includes material dating back from the current version to when I first started playing over twenty years ago. I've barely scratched the surface and will be playing long into retirement on what I already own. The good news is that the 3.5 material I haven't purchased yet is about to get a whole lot cheaper.

D&D isn't as cool as it used to be when it wasn't popular. Wizards of the Coast is simply catering to a new generation of gamers raised on video games and MMORPGs, neither or which are at all particularly effective at limitless interactive story-telling. So the proposed virtual table top fails to interest me too. I like real dice, real metallic miniatures, vinyl mats, dungeon tiles, and my trees and rocks. Still, if I were to consider using one, I'd use Fantasy Grounds which looks a whole lot better (it looks far more friendly an accessible to those with visual imparements). What gamers really need are more tools for running games and generating game objects such as monsters and non-player characters. Wizards of the Coast seems to have given up on the idea of producing such tools. I would even consider subscribing to an online database of spells, monsters and magic items. I recognize that there are areas where some innovation is needed but recreating the game every so often doesn't really achieve that. What it does achieve is improve profit margins, which after all is the real goal of D&D 4E.
 

I like some of the changes that have been proposed in 4e, and am a little skeptical of others. But the real reason I'll be upgrading is that almost everyone in my group is already sold on the idea.
 

1) Because the current edition doesn't work work well past mid level (IMHO, YMMV, for certain values of work, etc...)

2) D&D was never cool.

3) The linked blog post at techrepublic is junk.

There are more than two kind of D&D player, as ENWorld amply demonstrates, And having a better functioning set of mechanics doesn't prevent people from "improving, adapting and winging it", or achieving the "ice-cream and chocolate sundaes D&D we had back in the Good Old Days".

Does that answer your question?
 
Last edited:

For me, it isn't a question of "IF I'll switch" but rather "When I'll switch." (Well, maybe just the slightest "If", but only the slightest.) How easy will it be to transform our current campaign over to 4E, and how close we are to wrapping it up, are the biggest factors.

What I'm reading about 4E addresses most of my issues with 3.X, and I've read little to give me concern. All of my current concerns involve DDI, but I play now without electronic help except ETools.
 



Kwalish Kid said:
I vote for the banhammer.


If you had a problem with it, you should have reported it. You didn't. Instead, you posted this.

Some folks here need to think on that a bit. Getting confrontational, mean, or ascribing unsavory motives to a post in no way makes these boards a nicer place to be. Doing so in the name of making the boards better... is just plain backwards.

Consider the results of what you are gong to say before you post, folks.

Thread closed.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top