Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does 5E SUCK?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 6642417" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Actually that's a huge part of it. 5e, like Classic versions of D&D is very much a resource-management game. If you're not managing a scarce, important, resource, you're barely playing the game at all. 5e goes pretty far in recognizing that, and gives every class and almost every sub-class some such resource management. Even the Champion & Battlemaster have some short-rest-recharge resources to manage. Thing is, they're strictly combat resources.</p><p></p><p>It's not that any can't contribute at all in each pillar, it's that there's a few sub-classes that don't contribute meaningfully - that, in essence, aren't playing the game in those pillars.</p><p></p><p> That would be a bad thing, if it were true, because it would mean the game was failing to represent the character's abilities in exploration & interaction.</p><p></p><p>When you resort to use the players 'RP' as a resolution mechanism, you lose all connection to the character, itself. It's not you playing a character negotiating with bandits or exploring a ruin, it's /you/ hypothetically negotiating with bandits or exploring a ruin, yourself. Which is just lame.</p><p></p><p>Fortunately, the game does give you stats and proficiencies so you and the DM have some guide of how your character performs in those pillars, at a base-line, before any resources are expended. And, really, there's not a whole lot to choose among classes at that base-line. Some have certain skills in-class, others more or more useful skills. Two classes have Expertise. A few have situational special abilities. That's about it until you get into managing expendable resources.</p><p></p><p>As has been pointed out up-thread, the bottom-of-the-barrel performance with any check has been raised (the DC bar lowered in 5e) to the point that any character can some base-line contribution, barely differentiable from any other character some fraction of the time (unless you look at the natural d20 roll). What that means is that any given check might be delivered on by any given character based on the relative die rolls. That doesn't mean much, but much has been made of it up thread. </p><p></p><p>Where things get interesting, where you actually start making a contribution and genuinely playing the game, is when you contribute something more than your luck with a d20 - when you decide whether & how to use a managed resource.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 6642417, member: 996"] Actually that's a huge part of it. 5e, like Classic versions of D&D is very much a resource-management game. If you're not managing a scarce, important, resource, you're barely playing the game at all. 5e goes pretty far in recognizing that, and gives every class and almost every sub-class some such resource management. Even the Champion & Battlemaster have some short-rest-recharge resources to manage. Thing is, they're strictly combat resources. It's not that any can't contribute at all in each pillar, it's that there's a few sub-classes that don't contribute meaningfully - that, in essence, aren't playing the game in those pillars. That would be a bad thing, if it were true, because it would mean the game was failing to represent the character's abilities in exploration & interaction. When you resort to use the players 'RP' as a resolution mechanism, you lose all connection to the character, itself. It's not you playing a character negotiating with bandits or exploring a ruin, it's /you/ hypothetically negotiating with bandits or exploring a ruin, yourself. Which is just lame. Fortunately, the game does give you stats and proficiencies so you and the DM have some guide of how your character performs in those pillars, at a base-line, before any resources are expended. And, really, there's not a whole lot to choose among classes at that base-line. Some have certain skills in-class, others more or more useful skills. Two classes have Expertise. A few have situational special abilities. That's about it until you get into managing expendable resources. As has been pointed out up-thread, the bottom-of-the-barrel performance with any check has been raised (the DC bar lowered in 5e) to the point that any character can some base-line contribution, barely differentiable from any other character some fraction of the time (unless you look at the natural d20 roll). What that means is that any given check might be delivered on by any given character based on the relative die rolls. That doesn't mean much, but much has been made of it up thread. Where things get interesting, where you actually start making a contribution and genuinely playing the game, is when you contribute something more than your luck with a d20 - when you decide whether & how to use a managed resource. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does 5E SUCK?
Top