Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does 5E SUCK?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tyrlaan" data-source="post: 6653326" data-attributes="member: 20998"><p>That's a big plate of assumptions that's a bit more than I normally like to eat at a meal.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Who argued that 5e delivers dangers in a way that no other game has? Oddly enough, my argument is that, despite folks claiming it <em>does</em> deliver dangers in a new way (or "new retro" or just "not 4e", pick your phraseology), it most assuredly does not. Figuring out how to deliver danger is always in the hands of the GM and 5e does not change this. Now, people are arguing they have issue with adjudicating DCs in 5e, but that's a very, very different claim than it delivers dangers in a different way</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Assuming the problem is one of understanding when the thread has been going strong for 75+ pages with very long and detailed replies is probably a bad assumption to hold. Instead perhaps assume that people know what they are talking about and just see things differently than you</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Why the 4e/5e commentary again? I don't see how it's relevant to make a point other than to discredit the person you disagree with... which isn't making a point</li> </ul><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll keep this brief because I think you're being pretty inflammatory here.</p><p></p><p>You like 5e. That's very cool for you. You know what? Just because someone has explained they don't like something about 5e here in this thread doesn't mean they don't like 5e too. RPGs cover a lot of ground, which means they have a lot of room for people to like some aspects and dislike others.</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Disliking a part of a game doesn't mean you dislike the whole game.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Disliking a part or the entirety of a game doesn't mean other people have to dislike it too.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Disliking a part or the entirety of a game does not mean the root cause of the dislike is a bias to another game.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Liking a game or part of the game doesn't mean disliking the same thing is incorrect, blatantly false, or based on gross simplifications.</li> </ul><p>Please take this into consideration in future replies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tyrlaan, post: 6653326, member: 20998"] That's a big plate of assumptions that's a bit more than I normally like to eat at a meal. [LIST] [*]Who argued that 5e delivers dangers in a way that no other game has? Oddly enough, my argument is that, despite folks claiming it [I]does[/I] deliver dangers in a new way (or "new retro" or just "not 4e", pick your phraseology), it most assuredly does not. Figuring out how to deliver danger is always in the hands of the GM and 5e does not change this. Now, people are arguing they have issue with adjudicating DCs in 5e, but that's a very, very different claim than it delivers dangers in a different way [*]Assuming the problem is one of understanding when the thread has been going strong for 75+ pages with very long and detailed replies is probably a bad assumption to hold. Instead perhaps assume that people know what they are talking about and just see things differently than you [*]Why the 4e/5e commentary again? I don't see how it's relevant to make a point other than to discredit the person you disagree with... which isn't making a point [/LIST] I'll keep this brief because I think you're being pretty inflammatory here. You like 5e. That's very cool for you. You know what? Just because someone has explained they don't like something about 5e here in this thread doesn't mean they don't like 5e too. RPGs cover a lot of ground, which means they have a lot of room for people to like some aspects and dislike others. [list] [*]Disliking a part of a game doesn't mean you dislike the whole game. [*]Disliking a part or the entirety of a game doesn't mean other people have to dislike it too. [*]Disliking a part or the entirety of a game does not mean the root cause of the dislike is a bias to another game. [*]Liking a game or part of the game doesn't mean disliking the same thing is incorrect, blatantly false, or based on gross simplifications. [/list] Please take this into consideration in future replies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does 5E SUCK?
Top