Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does 5E SUCK?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6658757" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>I hadn't looked at it that way. (Which is not to say you're wrong.)</p><p></p><p>To me, it seems more like your discussion with [MENTION=957]BryonD[/MENTION]: he wants to frame DCs by reference to Conan and Aragorn, you want to frame them by reference to paragon-tier PCs, and BryonD sees some radical contrast whereas - like you - I don't see the issue at all. What are Conan and Aragorn, after all, but (in 4e terms) paradigms of the paragon tier?</p><p></p><p></p><p>How do we tell if a DC is higher than what Conan can do? What is Conan's bonus to climbing, survival, etc? It seems to me that has to be determined on a genre basis - REH didn't pencil D&D stats into his margins.</p><p></p><p>It seems to me the real issue is whether the GM, in framing some challenge and assigning it a mechanical difficulty within the system, has regard to the likely prospects of success for his/her players' PCs, and to the likely pacing consequences of the players engaging that ingame situation via their PCs. Some systems make this easier for the GM who wants to do so (Robin Laws's HeroQuest Revised is probably the poster child here, but 4e is at least in the same general neighbourhood). For reasons I don't really understand some people seem to think that having regard to such considerations, as a GM, is inimical to "real" roleplaying. (But many of those critics still use hit point ablation as their combat mechanic!)</p><p></p><p>And yet fantasy fiction is heavily populated by minor antagonists who fall to a single sword blow from Conan, Aragorn, Gandalf, Lancelot, etc, etc.</p><p></p><p>In a system that uses hit point ablation to <em>prevent</em> one-shot kills, you need to sidestep that system if you want that sort of event to take place. You can either do this on the player side - give the players resources that permit them to bypass NPC/monster hit points and one-shot them - or you can do it on the GM side. 4e does it on the GM side by default, though plenty of 4e games also feature it on the player side, with "minionisation" via successful skill check or skill challenge.</p><p></p><p>On the question of verisimilitude, I personally can't see the hit point system as a measure of what seems true-to -life, as if it is unrealistic that anyone should ever fall to a single arrow or magic missile or mighty-thewed swing of the sword.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6658757, member: 42582"] I hadn't looked at it that way. (Which is not to say you're wrong.) To me, it seems more like your discussion with [MENTION=957]BryonD[/MENTION]: he wants to frame DCs by reference to Conan and Aragorn, you want to frame them by reference to paragon-tier PCs, and BryonD sees some radical contrast whereas - like you - I don't see the issue at all. What are Conan and Aragorn, after all, but (in 4e terms) paradigms of the paragon tier? How do we tell if a DC is higher than what Conan can do? What is Conan's bonus to climbing, survival, etc? It seems to me that has to be determined on a genre basis - REH didn't pencil D&D stats into his margins. It seems to me the real issue is whether the GM, in framing some challenge and assigning it a mechanical difficulty within the system, has regard to the likely prospects of success for his/her players' PCs, and to the likely pacing consequences of the players engaging that ingame situation via their PCs. Some systems make this easier for the GM who wants to do so (Robin Laws's HeroQuest Revised is probably the poster child here, but 4e is at least in the same general neighbourhood). For reasons I don't really understand some people seem to think that having regard to such considerations, as a GM, is inimical to "real" roleplaying. (But many of those critics still use hit point ablation as their combat mechanic!) And yet fantasy fiction is heavily populated by minor antagonists who fall to a single sword blow from Conan, Aragorn, Gandalf, Lancelot, etc, etc. In a system that uses hit point ablation to [I]prevent[/I] one-shot kills, you need to sidestep that system if you want that sort of event to take place. You can either do this on the player side - give the players resources that permit them to bypass NPC/monster hit points and one-shot them - or you can do it on the GM side. 4e does it on the GM side by default, though plenty of 4e games also feature it on the player side, with "minionisation" via successful skill check or skill challenge. On the question of verisimilitude, I personally can't see the hit point system as a measure of what seems true-to -life, as if it is unrealistic that anyone should ever fall to a single arrow or magic missile or mighty-thewed swing of the sword. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does 5E SUCK?
Top