Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is/was melee training so bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thrael" data-source="post: 5287563" data-attributes="member: 93721"><p>You're right. This isn't due to Knights or Slayers. This is due to people trying to build off of one less attribute. They want to be as good as melee classes with STR primary. Those want to be better because they pay with an otherwise less useful primary attribute.</p><p></p><p>There's those who, in order to better optimize (and nothing else is whining over 2 or 3 damage while completely missing the benefit of skimping on one otherwise less useful attribute), go to lengths to rationalize how STR is not needed for melee attacks. They invent fluff to derive mechanical benefits from it.</p><p></p><p>STR has one skill, carrying capacity and MBAs going for it. CON has one skill, hps, healing surges, lots of feats, lots of riders (and is competing STR for Fortitude). WIS has five skills (most importantly, Perception and Insight). All the other attributes have 3+ skills, AC and/or initiative and see plenty of use as a secondary attribute.</p><p></p><p>How about you accept that STR makes attacks which were mostly unplanned (OAs, granted, free action attacks etc.) better? Just like I accept that there's no single feat to use WIS for everything CON grants. Even though, you know, it's my wisdom and forethought that makes my life quite a healthy one, not my body (the healthiest, longest living humans are neither bulging muscles nor stocky like dwarves - marathon runners, Asians etc. and they are all pretty reasonable... see determinants for health: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health#Maintaining_health" target="_blank">Health - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a>)</p><p></p><p>So there's my fluff to replace CON with WIS. Come to think of it, perhaps Dwarves are so healthy for their WIS too and not their CON. Soon I'll build my character off a single very useful attribute...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>2-3 damage don't make you incompetent. However, not everyone is equal, and neither should they. There's other benefits your class has by using an attribute different than STR for melee. But if it bothers you so much then account for it! Put some into STR. Decisions should have consequences. You can't have your cake and eat it too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thrael, post: 5287563, member: 93721"] You're right. This isn't due to Knights or Slayers. This is due to people trying to build off of one less attribute. They want to be as good as melee classes with STR primary. Those want to be better because they pay with an otherwise less useful primary attribute. There's those who, in order to better optimize (and nothing else is whining over 2 or 3 damage while completely missing the benefit of skimping on one otherwise less useful attribute), go to lengths to rationalize how STR is not needed for melee attacks. They invent fluff to derive mechanical benefits from it. STR has one skill, carrying capacity and MBAs going for it. CON has one skill, hps, healing surges, lots of feats, lots of riders (and is competing STR for Fortitude). WIS has five skills (most importantly, Perception and Insight). All the other attributes have 3+ skills, AC and/or initiative and see plenty of use as a secondary attribute. How about you accept that STR makes attacks which were mostly unplanned (OAs, granted, free action attacks etc.) better? Just like I accept that there's no single feat to use WIS for everything CON grants. Even though, you know, it's my wisdom and forethought that makes my life quite a healthy one, not my body (the healthiest, longest living humans are neither bulging muscles nor stocky like dwarves - marathon runners, Asians etc. and they are all pretty reasonable... see determinants for health: [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health#Maintaining_health"]Health - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/URL]) So there's my fluff to replace CON with WIS. Come to think of it, perhaps Dwarves are so healthy for their WIS too and not their CON. Soon I'll build my character off a single very useful attribute... 2-3 damage don't make you incompetent. However, not everyone is equal, and neither should they. There's other benefits your class has by using an attribute different than STR for melee. But if it bothers you so much then account for it! Put some into STR. Decisions should have consequences. You can't have your cake and eat it too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is/was melee training so bad?
Top