Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why the Encounter Powers hate? (Maneuvers = Encounter)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pickles JG" data-source="post: 5952100" data-attributes="member: 61501"><p>I did not get this at all. I liked the reworking of the Cleric & Wizard to give them a stronger flavour but the one dimeinsional martial classes left me cold.</p><p> </p><p>I share pemerton's experience of 4e as a player. Different characters feel very different in play. Even 3-4 different rogues played together can feel different (DPS movement tricks status efffects). Some classes fail at this -a bow ranger is pretty much a bow ranger but he feels different from everyone else.</p><p> </p><p>OTOH from a DM perspective the game felt scripted to me sometimes. I ran a group from the preview to 16th level over 3 years at one session every month or two. By the end of it I could predict exactly what each character was going to do in each fight, even though several of the players would spend a while pondering what their actions were going to be. (3/5 PCs were the pregens!)</p><p> </p><p>I like 4e a lot but I do not feel encounter powers give options other than superficially. Each encounter power is significantly more potent than an at will so you are going to use it sometime in each fight, the question is when. For very straightforward classes when all the encounter powers just deal more damage in differing amounts it's merely a matter of lining them up. For the more ticksy powers or ones that have areas of effect there is the tactical game of trying to set them up for best effect.</p><p>I think this is even worse for psionic classes where they seem to have a huge range of options for spending their powerpoints but in practice they have a best option that they spam most of the time. </p><p> </p><p>This applies less to some characters who have more situational powers like rogues who get a lot of damage from sneak attack & they can use encounter powers to do things they ony need occasionally like sliding enemies around.</p><p> </p><p>Dailies in different classes work the similalrly. Some classes have one per fight dailies, the best example being Barbarians. They plan to spend one daily rage in every fight regardless of how tough it is. </p><p>Other classes have Oh ****! dailies that they pull out when the fight is going badly or looks likely to such as massive healing powers. </p><p>There are also situational daily powers that cover a specific problem you might have but will not be useful in every difficult fight. Many controller powers sit here such as one my rogue had to knock an enemy prone for a while which was for shooting down awkward fliers.</p><p>Massive damage powers such as Rangers get probably fit in between the first two categories. If things are looking tough then quickly killing a bad guy or two can certainly help & across a party using one or two in each fight can save other resources. </p><p> </p><p>Anyway that's drifting off topic but explains why 4e classes feel different to me. </p><p> </p><p>Back on topic I can live without encounter powers but would certainly not object to having them. I think I would be happiest if there were some situational abilities you might use every couple of fights when they gave good value ie not just high damage attacks. Ie these would be tricks that work pretty much automatically.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pickles JG, post: 5952100, member: 61501"] I did not get this at all. I liked the reworking of the Cleric & Wizard to give them a stronger flavour but the one dimeinsional martial classes left me cold. I share pemerton's experience of 4e as a player. Different characters feel very different in play. Even 3-4 different rogues played together can feel different (DPS movement tricks status efffects). Some classes fail at this -a bow ranger is pretty much a bow ranger but he feels different from everyone else. OTOH from a DM perspective the game felt scripted to me sometimes. I ran a group from the preview to 16th level over 3 years at one session every month or two. By the end of it I could predict exactly what each character was going to do in each fight, even though several of the players would spend a while pondering what their actions were going to be. (3/5 PCs were the pregens!) I like 4e a lot but I do not feel encounter powers give options other than superficially. Each encounter power is significantly more potent than an at will so you are going to use it sometime in each fight, the question is when. For very straightforward classes when all the encounter powers just deal more damage in differing amounts it's merely a matter of lining them up. For the more ticksy powers or ones that have areas of effect there is the tactical game of trying to set them up for best effect. I think this is even worse for psionic classes where they seem to have a huge range of options for spending their powerpoints but in practice they have a best option that they spam most of the time. This applies less to some characters who have more situational powers like rogues who get a lot of damage from sneak attack & they can use encounter powers to do things they ony need occasionally like sliding enemies around. Dailies in different classes work the similalrly. Some classes have one per fight dailies, the best example being Barbarians. They plan to spend one daily rage in every fight regardless of how tough it is. Other classes have Oh ****! dailies that they pull out when the fight is going badly or looks likely to such as massive healing powers. There are also situational daily powers that cover a specific problem you might have but will not be useful in every difficult fight. Many controller powers sit here such as one my rogue had to knock an enemy prone for a while which was for shooting down awkward fliers. Massive damage powers such as Rangers get probably fit in between the first two categories. If things are looking tough then quickly killing a bad guy or two can certainly help & across a party using one or two in each fight can save other resources. Anyway that's drifting off topic but explains why 4e classes feel different to me. Back on topic I can live without encounter powers but would certainly not object to having them. I think I would be happiest if there were some situational abilities you might use every couple of fights when they gave good value ie not just high damage attacks. Ie these would be tricks that work pretty much automatically. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why the Encounter Powers hate? (Maneuvers = Encounter)
Top