You didn't. Someone else certainly did. Um...Darkwolf, anyone?
Yeah.
WP
carmachu said:Not to be rude or anything, but why should I care whether wil wheaton likes or doesnt like 4e?
I feel left out and rejected. Even Ensign Crusher likes 4e. Time to go eat some ice cream and cry myself to sleep.
The reason you prefer "geek" to "nerd" is that "geek" has been moving increasingly into the mainstream, whereas "nerd" still holds heavy negative connotations. People like us will admit more or less proudly to being geeks, but usually take some exception if called nerds, except with acceptable irony or in self-deprecation.I maintain that 'nerd' is a label that's becoming less relevant. Being smart is becoming more important in society, and the people doing the creative work are more increasingly 'nerdy' (although I prefer "geek" as a term, personally) in film, certainly. As such, I suppose we're both right!
One could ask the same thing about anyone's review of anything, anywhere.Not to be rude or anything, but why should I care whether wil wheaton likes or doesnt like 4e?
Jeff Wilder said:BTW, I enjoyed Wil's blog entry, but I came away with the impression that Wil would have raved just as strongly if he'd played 3.5 or the mythical 4E that might have been.
BTW, I enjoyed Wil's blog entry, but I came away with the impression that Wil would have raved just as strongly if he'd played 3.5 or the mythical 4E that might have been.
One could ask the same thing about anyone's review of anything, anywhere.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.