Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6240131" data-attributes="member: 37579">I'd prefer an approach similar to 2e. Or what Pathfinder is doing. Where they reprint the core books with errata and small changes.&nbsp; They had planned to do this for 3e, but because of constant staff changes (and poor management that didn't restraint the designer's willingness to design) the plan grew from reprints with errata into a full revision of the game.But a minor revision with errata and clarifications might also be permissible. Where they rewrite a few rules for clarity but don't actually change any mechangs. Although, a few small tweaks of the really, really broken stuff might also be good, so long as the changes are also provided in an errata document. However, if they're up front about planning a revision, that might hurt initial sales as people just decide to wait for the finished version. But this is all off topic...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6240131, member: 37579"] I'd prefer an approach similar to 2e. Or what Pathfinder is doing. Where they reprint the core books with errata and small changes. They had planned to do this for 3e, but because of constant staff changes (and poor management that didn't restraint the designer's willingness to design) the plan grew from reprints with errata into a full revision of the game. But a minor revision with errata and clarifications might also be permissible. Where they rewrite a few rules for clarity but don't actually [I]change[/I] any mechangs. Although, a few small tweaks of the really, really broken stuff might also be good, so long as the changes are also provided in an errata document. However, if they're up front about planning a revision, that might hurt initial sales as people just decide to wait for the finished version. But this is all off topic... [/QUOTE]

Verification