Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6107214" data-attributes="member: 1465">Yes but the problem I see is that attacks scales to the same magnitudes as spells DC, and AC and ST don't scale (except for general increase on ability scores that affect all these 4 equally). But AC is higher than ST because of equipment, at least for some characters. This means that the rate of success of a spell is better compared to that of a weapon attack, and damage also is getting better. Spells will then be limited by daily slots, but at mid-level they are already plenty enough to cast often enough.Don't know, maybe it all works fine after all. Personally I hope they don't put ST progressions back, it would be one more thing to keep track of. If the effect is the same, I would prefer they remove the spellcasting bonus. Would this mean a high level wizard has the same chance of affecting you with a spell as a low level wizard? Yes it would (except for the higher spellcasting ability score, but difference will be small since it caps at 20). But the real question is, would this really be that bad?? We're talking about spellcasters who always dominate the game at high levels anyway, and a higher level wizard will anyway have more powerful spells and bigger damage on lower spells too, so why should we be afraid of keeping the save DC low?Edit: ninjad by [MENTION=17077]Falling Icicle[/MENTION]</blockquote>