Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zoroaster100" data-source="post: 5316975" data-attributes="member: 8538"><p>I really like that they are mostly eliminating feat prerequisites.&nbsp; Yes, I can reflavor one of the old racial feats, but then I have to wonder if the prerequisite was put in for some game balance reason I'm overlooking.&nbsp; I'd rather they ONLY put prerequisites on feats if it is required for game balance or because it only works with a certain racial or class feature, not for flavor reasons.&nbsp; On the other hand, I really hope they take a closer look when publishing new feats in Dragon. If feats are useable by everyone, they can do more damage to the game if they are sorely under or over powered.&nbsp; With the new organization for feats it should be more obvious when someone is creating a new feat whether it is filling a role already filled by an existing feat, so duplicative, overpowered or underpowered feats should be easier to avoid with a little care.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="zoroaster100, post: 5316975, member: 8538"] I really like that they are mostly eliminating feat prerequisites. Yes, I can reflavor one of the old racial feats, but then I have to wonder if the prerequisite was put in for some game balance reason I'm overlooking. I'd rather they ONLY put prerequisites on feats if it is required for game balance or because it only works with a certain racial or class feature, not for flavor reasons. On the other hand, I really hope they take a closer look when publishing new feats in Dragon. If feats are useable by everyone, they can do more damage to the game if they are sorely under or over powered. With the new organization for feats it should be more obvious when someone is creating a new feat whether it is filling a role already filled by an existing feat, so duplicative, overpowered or underpowered feats should be easier to avoid with a little care. [/QUOTE]

Verification