WotC acknowledges 4th Edition Not for Everyone?

[ProfessorCirno]

Who are you and what did you do with the real Professor Cirno. I find myself agreeing with just about every one of your posts lately and that frightens me.

I still ain't too happy with parts of 4e, but by god, if you're going to find a fault with it, find a rational one ;p. This bizarro lashing out makes everyone involved looked bad. I look bad because he might agree with something I say, you look bad because you have to deal with a loon, and he looks bad because...well, do I even need to go there?

Thinking that Wizards has some devious scheme or is plotting with some hidden agenda - in their product marketing of all things - reeks of conspiracy theory, and unless your name is Deus Ex One, Not To Be Confused With Those Bad Sequels, your conspiracy theory should not be given much thought. If your name IS that, your parents are messed up.

 

[Charwoman Gene]

...? Are you referring to me? Because I don't think I said anything really horrible there...?

No, while we don't see eye to eye on a lot of 4e, I've seen plenty of other stuff that you've said that made me unignore you.

Truth is, I'm pretty sure I just pick someone I decide is a little obnoxious and decide they must be defeated. You were like that, and actually, I'm sorry for being as much of a jackass to you as I was.

 

[ProfessorCirno]

No, while we don't see eye to eye on a lot of 4e, I've seen plenty of other stuff that you've said that made me unignore you.

Truth is, I'm pretty sure I just pick someone I decide is a little obnoxious and decide they must be defeated. You were like that, and actually, I'm sorry for being as much of a jackass to you as I was.

Hey, no worries. It's not that uncommon to happen on the internet, and not really through anyone's personal fault; a good portion of what we type out will always be misunderstood. It's the nature of trying to reduce human communication - which is by and large very non-verbal - to strict text.