Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC blacklist. Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8673061" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>As someone who did play 4e on VTT, I can honestly say that yup, it makes a huge difference. Never minding the interrupts, it was tracking the status effects that would be a nightmare in 4e. We used to have a contest to see if we could cover the entire token with status effects - and we managed it a couple of times too. I believe the record was 12 or 13 status effects on a single target at the same time. :wow: It was just ludicrous. I couldn't imagine trying to do that tabletop.</p><p></p><p>But, no, 4e wasn't designed with VTT in mind. The VTT's were designed with 4e in mind - or at least the modules for Maptools I used were. It just automated so much. </p><p></p><p>Again, 4e was designed for public play. Virtually all the design decisions come down to the idea that you would sit down, routinely, with four other strangers, and be able to have a decent game without too much fuss. So, there is a considerable amount of overlap between that and how VTT play generally works, so, I think that's where you're seeing the idea that 4e was designed for VTT play.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As much of a fanbois of 4e that I am, I cannot disagree with this. Higher level 4e was brutal. Like I said, any system where you can actually apply more than 10 status effects at the same time is not designed for speed of play. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You mean like it is right now with 5e? Have you looked at the microtransactions you can do with either Fantasy Grounds or Roll20? You can spend any amount of money you want. Hell, Fantasy Grounds has offloaded so much development onto people who are doing small program improvements for micro-transactions. Stuff that absolutely should be part and parcel of Fantasy Grounds itself is being monetized and left to others. It's really annoying. You want Fantasy Grounds to have drop down menus instead of the radial menu? Pay 5 bucks to some non-FG developer and you can have that. You want auras to be automated so that your paladin's aura doesn't get forgotten during combat? Pay 2 bucks and we can do that.</p><p></p><p>I just want a Virtual Tabletop for 5e that ACTUALLY IMPLEMENTS the core rules found in the SRD. Is that really too much to ask when I have to drop 250 bucks on a program (ultimate License plus core 3 books)?</p><p></p><p>I really, really hope that WotC brings out their own VTT for the 2024 release. I will drop Fantasy Grounds like a sack of cement if they do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 8673061, member: 22779"] As someone who did play 4e on VTT, I can honestly say that yup, it makes a huge difference. Never minding the interrupts, it was tracking the status effects that would be a nightmare in 4e. We used to have a contest to see if we could cover the entire token with status effects - and we managed it a couple of times too. I believe the record was 12 or 13 status effects on a single target at the same time. :wow: It was just ludicrous. I couldn't imagine trying to do that tabletop. But, no, 4e wasn't designed with VTT in mind. The VTT's were designed with 4e in mind - or at least the modules for Maptools I used were. It just automated so much. Again, 4e was designed for public play. Virtually all the design decisions come down to the idea that you would sit down, routinely, with four other strangers, and be able to have a decent game without too much fuss. So, there is a considerable amount of overlap between that and how VTT play generally works, so, I think that's where you're seeing the idea that 4e was designed for VTT play. As much of a fanbois of 4e that I am, I cannot disagree with this. Higher level 4e was brutal. Like I said, any system where you can actually apply more than 10 status effects at the same time is not designed for speed of play. You mean like it is right now with 5e? Have you looked at the microtransactions you can do with either Fantasy Grounds or Roll20? You can spend any amount of money you want. Hell, Fantasy Grounds has offloaded so much development onto people who are doing small program improvements for micro-transactions. Stuff that absolutely should be part and parcel of Fantasy Grounds itself is being monetized and left to others. It's really annoying. You want Fantasy Grounds to have drop down menus instead of the radial menu? Pay 5 bucks to some non-FG developer and you can have that. You want auras to be automated so that your paladin's aura doesn't get forgotten during combat? Pay 2 bucks and we can do that. I just want a Virtual Tabletop for 5e that ACTUALLY IMPLEMENTS the core rules found in the SRD. Is that really too much to ask when I have to drop 250 bucks on a program (ultimate License plus core 3 books)? I really, really hope that WotC brings out their own VTT for the 2024 release. I will drop Fantasy Grounds like a sack of cement if they do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WotC blacklist. Discussion
Top