Absolutely true. I didn't respond to it because I concede the point. Pay content may, and by all rights should, be better than the free content we receive now. Some of the proposed content already seems like it would fit the bill, namely the stuff that we don't get now that sounds darned useful. That doesn't, however, minimize or negate my main point that people subscribing to the service will be less likely, as a matter of budgetary constraint, to continue hard-cover and mini purchase behaviour similar to the behavior they display today. That's less in-store sales which eventually translates to less in-store shelf space. The exact level of this effect will depend highly on how much the service costs. If it's relatively cheap, say similar to a subscription to Dungeon, I imagine the effect will be very minimal. Most players will only slightly alter their puchase plans to account for the expense, and a very few of us will begin to look for 3rd party publishers who do provide us the sort of content we want or lower priced products. If it's ~$10USD/month, I would expect the in-store purchasing change to be more readily apparent and translate into much reduced offerings at mainstream vendors (and eventually hobby-vendors and FLGSs as well) within 6 months to a year. If it's much more than that, I doubt there will be much of a change because so few people will pay for the service at all (at least as it's currently envisioned by the OP's cut/paste).Eric Anondson said:There were two important words in my response. "More" and "better". It still seems like you are assuming that by paying for a service WotC wouldn't apply that income towards that service to make it better that what was free or make more of what was once provided for free... that there is a finite amount of what WotC would be providing regardless of how much money WotC gets to spend on it.
Same here. If it was cheap and of good quality, I would fork out dosh for it as well.countgray said:I would totally pay for the content listed above. Depends how much they charge, but all of that is something I would be interested in.
Rodrigo Istalindir said:It's going to be one more thing we have to be careful about posting around here, though.
DaveMage said:I'm not sure what I would do should this come to pass.
I'm guessing that this will tie in with 4E somehow, but I will have to wait and see if 4E is right for me first.
DaveMage said:Why?
What concern do you see?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.