Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WOTC Possibly Removing "Druids" for Religious/Cultural Sensitivity Reasons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mannahnin" data-source="post: 9168466" data-attributes="member: 7026594"><p>I was going to note the same. While Rhaez' list is obviously silly and facetious, the points are real. 1) Made-up names avoid real-world cultural reference, and 2) they have the advantage from a corporate perspective of being copyrightable, 3) Made up names have the downside of not being immediately evocative or grounding.</p><p></p><p>When I started playing Warhammer in the 90s they had paint colors like Blood Red, Bleached Bone, Tentacle Pink, etc. And these were reasonably descriptive but also easy for third party paint companies to do similar names for their matching paint colors. Bloody Red, Bone Tan, Tentacular Pink, or what have you. And GW did eventually rename their colors after their factions, with stuff like Iyanden Yellow, Biel-Tan Green, Space Wolf Grey, etc. And yeah, they did similar with their factions which had more generic names. Imperial Guard getting renamed Astra Militarum. Sisters of Battle to Adepta Sororitas, etc. This makes it a little trickier for TPP to encroach on their IP.</p><p></p><p>I don't think this approach is a perfect fit for D&D, though, because D&D doesn't have one big all-encompassing setting. By design, D&D is meant to support both its published settings and homebrew settings. And evoking archetypes from real world history, mythology, and folklore is very helpful for players to be able to imagine stuff. If I use a made up name like "Jedi", or "Sith Lord" I've got to introduce people to the fiction defining what the heck that is, so the word means something to them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, tastes and standards change over time, but I'm in a similar spot on those names. Druid and Barbarian don't bother me at all. My understanding is that the term "Shaman" was used generically/universalized a lot for decades, but that there's been some pushback on that practice in academia, because it is a term borrowed from a specific culture and the way the English term was defined has gotten kind of inappropriately applied to unrelated cultures like, e.g., Native American ones.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mannahnin, post: 9168466, member: 7026594"] I was going to note the same. While Rhaez' list is obviously silly and facetious, the points are real. 1) Made-up names avoid real-world cultural reference, and 2) they have the advantage from a corporate perspective of being copyrightable, 3) Made up names have the downside of not being immediately evocative or grounding. When I started playing Warhammer in the 90s they had paint colors like Blood Red, Bleached Bone, Tentacle Pink, etc. And these were reasonably descriptive but also easy for third party paint companies to do similar names for their matching paint colors. Bloody Red, Bone Tan, Tentacular Pink, or what have you. And GW did eventually rename their colors after their factions, with stuff like Iyanden Yellow, Biel-Tan Green, Space Wolf Grey, etc. And yeah, they did similar with their factions which had more generic names. Imperial Guard getting renamed Astra Militarum. Sisters of Battle to Adepta Sororitas, etc. This makes it a little trickier for TPP to encroach on their IP. I don't think this approach is a perfect fit for D&D, though, because D&D doesn't have one big all-encompassing setting. By design, D&D is meant to support both its published settings and homebrew settings. And evoking archetypes from real world history, mythology, and folklore is very helpful for players to be able to imagine stuff. If I use a made up name like "Jedi", or "Sith Lord" I've got to introduce people to the fiction defining what the heck that is, so the word means something to them. Yeah, tastes and standards change over time, but I'm in a similar spot on those names. Druid and Barbarian don't bother me at all. My understanding is that the term "Shaman" was used generically/universalized a lot for decades, but that there's been some pushback on that practice in academia, because it is a term borrowed from a specific culture and the way the English term was defined has gotten kind of inappropriately applied to unrelated cultures like, e.g., Native American ones. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
WOTC Possibly Removing "Druids" for Religious/Cultural Sensitivity Reasons
Top