WotC quietly deleting access to the 3e SRD


log in or register to remove this ad



Mistwell

Crusty Old Meatwad (he/him)
Holy jesus.

That is... wow. WOW. WotC just doubling down on this, huh?
No. THIS part is frankly hysteria. This happened years ago, not now. Long before this issue existed. And these docs are in a LOT of places and always have been for years. Google any of these docs and you can find them easily. They're not "disappearing" and never did. WOTC just stopped hosting copies, like lots and lots of other stuff they stopped hosting, quite a while ago, with no nefarious intent apparent.

I understand people are afraid. People sometimes behave badly when they're afraid. I am seeing a lot of people ramp up the fear of others with implications of nefarious plots and conspiracies by WOTC years in the making. It's not a good look - and I don't mean for WOTC.
 

Art Waring

halozix.com
Oh dear, good thing its all over the internet, and I think I have half a dozen separate copies scattered amongst all the various SRD files I have.
 

Xyxox

Hero
Follow the license. It’s widely available on the web though. I wouldn’t worry about that going away.
A lot of people are worrying about it going away. I am still of the opinion that WotC/Hasbro cannot revoke or "unauthorize" it, though I would also agree they can force abandonment of it a condition of acceptance of OGL 1.1, which is what I believe the language in the leaked portion is actually doing.
 

A lot of people are worrying about it going away. I am still of the opinion that WotC/Hasbro cannot revoke or "unauthorize" it,
I don't know if they can or can't win if it goes through full court and a judge rules... I bet no lawyer can say for 100%. However if WotC loses $2,000,000 in legal fees and don't win it will be a hit but a really small annoying one... if a group of small publishers spend half that (1 mil) to win that could still bankrupt them even in victory.

If 1 or 2 big players make a side deal to not need to use the OGL, then nobody can or will try.

It's not "You can't win because your wrong" it's "they can make it cost you everything just to try...

that group that MIGHT win if they throw 1mil at it... and they lose, that would be DEVISTATING. and they have to weigh then that they MAY lose.

some one get that Picard quote meme about loseing when you do everything right
 

Xyxox

Hero
I don't know if they can or can't win if it goes through full court and a judge rules... I bet no lawyer can say for 100%. However if WotC loses $2,000,000 in legal fees and don't win it will be a hit but a really small annoying one... if a group of small publishers spend half that (1 mil) to win that could still bankrupt them even in victory.

If 1 or 2 big players make a side deal to not need to use the OGL, then nobody can or will try.

It's not "You can't win because your wrong" it's "they can make it cost you everything just to try...

that group that MIGHT win if they throw 1mil at it... and they lose, that would be DEVISTATING. and they have to weigh then that they MAY lose.

some one get that Picard quote meme about loseing when you do everything right
But what if they aren't planning on doing any of that because they know they cannot afford the lost good will?
 


Drake2000

Explorer
But what if they aren't planning on doing any of that because they know they cannot afford the lost good will?
I would assume that they are weighing the cost of the lost good will against the potential increases in revenue that they are projecting from increased monetization, and drooling in anticipation.
 


Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
A lot of people are worrying about it going away. I am still of the opinion that WotC/Hasbro cannot revoke or "unauthorize" it, though I would also agree they can force abandonment of it a condition of acceptance of OGL 1.1, which is what I believe the language in the leaked portion is actually doing.
You misunderstand me. I was referring to the prevalence of copies of the 3E SRD on the web.
 

Jadeite

Open Gaming Enthusiast
Please tell me this includes the warlock, Book of Nine Swords, Incarnum, and swift and immediate actions.
Swift and immediate actions are part of the Psionic SRD. Warlock, Martial Adept and Meldshapers aren't, but Dreamscarred Press created PFRPG1 versions of the Meldshapers and Adepts. There's also a 3.5 OGL/ PFRPG version of Binding by Dario Nardi.
 



Buzzqw

Explorer
Does anybody have the 5.0 srd?
some links

BHH
 

JEB

Legend
So what happens to SRDs hosted online, if OGL 1.1 really does (claim to) invalidate OGL 1.0/1.0a? I assume Wizards can't C&D folks for hosting copies of the OGL 1.0/1.0 text, but could they C&D folks hosting the 3.0, 3.5, and 5E SRDs as violating the terms of the only "authorized" OGL (1.1)?

Of course, such an action would utterly fail at wiping the SRDs off the Internet (especially now that folks are motivated to keep them available), but I'm just wondering what they could try to do.
 

Langy

Explorer
So what happens to SRDs hosted online, if OGL 1.1 really does (claim to) invalidate OGL 1.0/1.0a? I assume Wizards can't C&D folks for hosting copies of the OGL 1.0/1.0 text, but could they C&D folks hosting the 3.0, 3.5, and 5E SRDs as violating the terms of the only "authorized" OGL (1.1)?

Of course, such an action would utterly fail at wiping the SRDs off the Internet (especially now that folks are motivated to keep them available), but I'm just wondering what they could try to do.
If they believe what they're saying about the OGL, they likely do believe they can D&D folks from hosting the OGL 1.0/1.0a or any items derived from such, including the SRDs.
 

JEB

Legend
If they believe what they're saying about the OGL, they likely do believe they can D&D folks from hosting the OGL 1.0/1.0a or any items derived from such, including the SRDs.
It did occur to me after I posted that the text of the OGL 1.0/1.0a is copyrighted by Wizards and designated as Wizards property...
 


Epic Threats

An Advertisement

Advertisement4

Top