Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 8002312" data-attributes="member: 7023887">I don't believe this at all. They would never put 12+ subclasses in a setting book. Let's list them:<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Barbarian and Monk. The barbarian is wild-magic/fey in theme. The monk is the Astral Self. Both of these are Planescape, not Magic: the Gathering or Theros.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Sorcerer and Warlock. The sorcerer is the Aberrant Mind, which is connected to the Far Realm, but is now the Psionic Sorcerer. The Warlock is the Lurker in the Deep, which is more connected to the Elemental Plane of Water or krakens than M:tG or Theros.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The two theros subclasses.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Cleric, Druid, Wizard. The cleric seems to be shadowfell, if they're doing Planescape, but I'm not sure. Druid is Wildfire, which is 100% elemental plane of fire. The Wizard is Onomancy, which is true naming, so that's the Lower Planes/Fiends. That's Planescape, not M:tG.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Fighter, Ranger, Rogue. Fighter is the Rune Knight, not M:tG. Ranger is Swarmkeeper, which is connected to fey, so that's Planescape. The rogue is now the Phantom rogue, which is undeniably connected to planescape, not M:tG.</li> </ol>Those are the 12 subclasses that lead up to the class feature variants. I don't see any of those being connected to Theros or M:tG.</blockquote>