WotC yanks the rug out


log in or register to remove this ad

I'm sorry. I just have a real hard time getting worked up (much less all-caps worked up) over a specialty, small-print-run book being pushed back 3 months.
 



WHAT THE HELL, WIZARDS. WHAT THE HELL.


How much more bitter would you be if they released it with misprints and bad binding? How much more invective would you hurl- "THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE PRINTED THIS TIL IT WAS READY, HOW COULD THEY GIVE ME AN INFERIOR PRODUCT???!!1!!ELEVENTYONE!!!"

Sheesh. This delay is a good thing.
 



I wish I could XP people's XP comments, because this deserves it:

"That rug really tied the room together. Did it not?" --Wednesday Boy
 



I'm sorry. I just have a real hard time getting worked up (much less all-caps worked up) over a specialty, small-print-run book being pushed back 3 months.

Yeah, I'm really not seeing the ZOMG!!! issue here either. Not knowing the original scheduled date, it wasn't until I read the second post that I realised what the OP was upset about.

Before then I assumed it was the price that was the issue (or possibly the page count). Considering this book isn't exactly new content I would see the delay as much less of an issue compared to a completely new book (and even then it wouldn't be a big deal for me).

Olaf the Stout
 

I'm still wondering how a book company stays in business without releasing, you know, books. While printing issues are legitimate and a longtime problem regardless of publisher, I'm left feeling that WotC gave a pie-in-the-sky original release date just to keep their name and IP on the front pages.
 

Remove ads

Top