D&D 5E (2014) Would you marry a party member for +2 AC?

[TwoSix]

I'd do a whole lot more than marry them to get a +2 to AC.

 

[Istbor]

Honestly, I think the oddest thing about this is the 7 days. Should be longer I think. Unless that marital bliss really only lasts a week. Of course if it were longer, the +2 would be a bit strong.

I am certainly not going to stop some players from getting this buff if their characters marry, but considering my group, I find it highly unlikely.

 

[lowkey13]

*Deleted by user*

 

[Satyrn]

No.

I only marry for money.

 

[Istbor]

Protection for your honeymoon?

Yeah, but if we are all rich adventurers we can do a lot better than some pauper's 7 day honeymoon!

 

[Satyrn]

Yeah, but if we are all rich adventurers we can do a lot better than some pauper's 7 day honeymoon!

But there's a world to save, and there's no time for downtime!

 

[jgsugden]

Protection for your honeymoon?

Oddly, that is a common time for people to stop using protection.

 

[Jester David]

Only if they consumate the marriage.

 

[Jester David]

Protection for your honeymoon?

Silly Lowkey.
Shotguns are for weddings, not honeymoons.

 

[Guest 6801328]

Not only would I marry a party member for +2 AC, I'd kill him/her after 7 days and marry another one. Wash, rinse, repeat.

On a totally unrelated note, our table is actively recruiting new members. PM me for details.