X4: Master of the Desert Nomads - OOC


log in or register to remove this ad

Yes, I'll recruit, though I had been planning to wait. Do you think I should recruit replacement players for the existing XPCs?

BTW, Leif, if Bevin makes it to the next module and levels up, I was thinking I could let you retool him as a single classed Beguiler, if you want. The beguiler is described at CrystalKeep in the base classes pdf. It's sort of a roguish spellcaster.

Bevin's history indicates that he didn't start out as a spellcaster, and that background wouldn't change, just his current abilities.

Crystal Keep - D&D and d20 System
 

Leif would run Nargon, while Rhun would run Rajah. WD already has his PC's mount to control, and frankly Bevin and Aram seem a bit less powerful in combat than the others.

I'm fine with this. I didn't design Aram to be super powerful in combat...more lots of attacks and the ability to dance around damage. Unfortunately, I didn't realize what we would be facing, so that tactic hasn't worked great so far. LOL. Still, with the exception of the mass bandit attack, he has managed to do alright.
 

I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only player whose pc hasn't worked out like he planned! Ok, a few observations: Rhun is much more skilled than I at running a combat-oriented character, so I propose that he take on Nargon, and I'll fill in for our Rajah. How does that suit everyone? As to the beguiler, it's in PHII also, so I'll have a look. Re-tooling Bevin seems like a good idea to me! Assuming that he lives, of course.... I might have some other ideas of my own about class, though, like maybe a Duskblade? (Also PHII.)
 

Leif, I'm OK with either way but if you don't feel comfortable with running a combat-oriented character, you can either learn by trying to run one or by having things jump out at Bevin when he's alone and out of spells :)

I think the beguiler would be a good match for Bevin. The duskblade seems more melee oriented than Bevin has shown himself to be thus far, and I want to keep narrative back-compatibility.
 

I think the beguiler would be a good match for Bevin. The duskblade seems more melee oriented than Bevin has shown himself to be thus far, and I want to keep narrative back-compatibility.


The beguiler is a great class, though most of their spells are not really combat oriented. Still, I've found that class to be very fun to play.

The duskblade is a fun class to play, but is more complicated than most classed, because you have to learn how to use your melee attacks in combination with your spells; the ability to channel them through your weapon is cool, but definitely adds a new element to combat if you aren't used to playing one.
 

FYI...I don't have the Liber Mortis for handling Rajah. I see that his feats are at Crystal Keep, but I couldn't seem to find the details of the class itself there. So if you want me to run him, I may need some help from time to time.
 

Rhun,

I may be wrong but I was almost sure that dread necromancer was also in either complete arcane or complete mage. Still, seems like you would have already checked those, so I must be wrong about this too, no?

Kinem,

Bevin has not shown himself to be very combat oriented because I preferred to keep him alive! I have no problem running a combat-oriented character. In fact, as Rhun can attest, I sometimes put my non-front-line characters in harm's way too often. The Beguiler does sound interesting, but I don't think it would change the current status quo appreciably. Bevin might as well remain and Enchanter as convert to Beguiler. To preserve back-compatibility, I could play Bevin as a "conscientious objector" Duskblade? :)
 

Bevin's problem isn't that he's an Enchanter. It's that he's a 6th level wizard pretending to be an 8th level wizard.

Making him a beguiler would allow him to be a full caster while maintaining some roguish qualities.

That said, Leif, if you really prefer a duskblade I'll allow it. I like to be flexible on PC retooling in PBP due to the long time it takes to complete each adventure.
 

Bevin's problem isn't that he's an Enchanter. It's that he's a 6th level wizard pretending to be an 8th level wizard.
Making him a beguiler would allow him to be a full caster while maintaining some roguish qualities.
That said, Leif, if you really prefer a duskblade I'll allow it. I like to be flexible on PC retooling in PBP due to the long time it takes to complete each adventure.
Acutally, Kinem, now that I've given this more thought, I think that I've decided that I prefer the beguiler option for its own sake. Please just give me a little while longer to read up on it, ok?
 

Remove ads

Top