Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Xanathar's Guide to Everything: What subclasses made the cut?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marandahir" data-source="post: 7251188" data-attributes="member: 6803643"><p>Me too. Path of the Zealot expanded the idea of the Barbarian into Divine territory. </p><p></p><p>Whenever I see subclasses like the Divine Soul Sorcerer, the Oath of the Ancients Paladin, the Tradition of Theurgy Wizard, or the Scout Archetype Rogue, it makes me happy. Because we're taking a class that isn't normally associated with a particular story group (4e would have called it Power Source, but I would argue that Scout Rogue, despite no spells, is part of a story continuum with many Rangers, Druids, and Barbarians that are somewhat Primal or Nature themed). </p><p></p><p>Here we have the Barbarian entering into the Divine story group. And that's exciting to me, because it provides a new way of exploring divine archetypes, with a new set of ability scores that favour new races, and all in all lend to new character types that may be explored and played. New stories come from this.</p><p></p><p>I contrast this with Monster Slayer Conclave Ranger. It's a great subclass, don't get me wrong, and I like the idea of the Van Hellsing Ranger. I just don't think it expands the Ranger too far a field from the Hunter Conclave Ranger, who is specifically hunting down monsters, just maybe not monsters of the night (better with focusing on giant beasts, hordes of goblins, or distant foes, so a more generalist approach rather than a Gothic Vampire/Zombie/Werewolf/Flesh Golem Hunter approach). The idea is archetypal and good for the Ranger. But it doesn't subvert the expectations of the baseline class. If we say Ranger, most people think Hunter, or Beast if they're particularly taken to the 3e+ animal companion. If we say Barbarian, most people think Berserker. If we say Fighter, most people think Champion. If we say Cleric, most people think Life Domain. These are the classes at their most basic cores. It's what appears in the 5e SRD too, for that matter. But some of the new options in the books really excite me as they take the class chassis in a new direction. the PHB did this two, like Oath of the Ancients that I mentioned above. But this was few and far between. Now it's like half the book, and I like it!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marandahir, post: 7251188, member: 6803643"] Me too. Path of the Zealot expanded the idea of the Barbarian into Divine territory. Whenever I see subclasses like the Divine Soul Sorcerer, the Oath of the Ancients Paladin, the Tradition of Theurgy Wizard, or the Scout Archetype Rogue, it makes me happy. Because we're taking a class that isn't normally associated with a particular story group (4e would have called it Power Source, but I would argue that Scout Rogue, despite no spells, is part of a story continuum with many Rangers, Druids, and Barbarians that are somewhat Primal or Nature themed). Here we have the Barbarian entering into the Divine story group. And that's exciting to me, because it provides a new way of exploring divine archetypes, with a new set of ability scores that favour new races, and all in all lend to new character types that may be explored and played. New stories come from this. I contrast this with Monster Slayer Conclave Ranger. It's a great subclass, don't get me wrong, and I like the idea of the Van Hellsing Ranger. I just don't think it expands the Ranger too far a field from the Hunter Conclave Ranger, who is specifically hunting down monsters, just maybe not monsters of the night (better with focusing on giant beasts, hordes of goblins, or distant foes, so a more generalist approach rather than a Gothic Vampire/Zombie/Werewolf/Flesh Golem Hunter approach). The idea is archetypal and good for the Ranger. But it doesn't subvert the expectations of the baseline class. If we say Ranger, most people think Hunter, or Beast if they're particularly taken to the 3e+ animal companion. If we say Barbarian, most people think Berserker. If we say Fighter, most people think Champion. If we say Cleric, most people think Life Domain. These are the classes at their most basic cores. It's what appears in the 5e SRD too, for that matter. But some of the new options in the books really excite me as they take the class chassis in a new direction. the PHB did this two, like Oath of the Ancients that I mentioned above. But this was few and far between. Now it's like half the book, and I like it! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Xanathar's Guide to Everything: What subclasses made the cut?
Top