Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Phoenix8008" data-source="post: 1811" data-attributes="member: 211">Wicht, your concepts sound agreeable so far. With followers of Honor being the best fighters, would you say that someone not in a dojo might be equal to others of the same teir, whereas Honor followers in Dojos would be superior to all of equal rank?My only two gripes about the current Honor path are this:1. They need to be able to stay in/with the dojo structure longer. I don't see why someone (currently Brown belt) that can oversee multiple Dojo's has to give up the Dojo which they created. Makes no sense to me.2. They need some power that does not depend on the generator for it to work. Sig styles are great, but when every other path has stuff that always works when they want it to, then the Honor fighters can't really be the best fighters around.I don't know if these are more specific than what you are looking for right now or not, but I figured I'd add them just in case. I know they probably sound familiar to you from the original committee e-mails, but the rest may not have heard so I put them into the discussion since that's what this thread is for.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Phoenix8008, post: 1811, member: 211"] Wicht, your concepts sound agreeable so far. With followers of Honor being the best fighters, would you say that someone not in a dojo might be equal to others of the same teir, whereas Honor followers in Dojos would be superior to all of equal rank? My only two gripes about the current Honor path are this: 1. They need to be able to stay in/with the dojo structure longer. I don't see why someone (currently Brown belt) that can oversee multiple Dojo's has to give up the Dojo which they created. Makes no sense to me. 2. They need some power that does not depend on the generator for it to work. Sig styles are great, but when every other path has stuff that always works when they want it to, then the Honor fighters can't really be the best fighters around. I don't know if these are more specific than what you are looking for right now or not, but I figured I'd add them just in case. I know they probably sound familiar to you from the original committee e-mails, but the rest may not have heard so I put them into the discussion since that's what this thread is for. [/QUOTE]

Verification