Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Yedan's Troubleshooters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arrowhawk" data-source="post: 5883149" data-attributes="member: 6679551"><p>[sblock=ooc]As a DM, I used to subscribe to the "roll behind the screen" philosophy for combat. I did it because I thought it made the game more interesting and more scary/unpredictable/dangerous. But that was back when no one talked about OOC/IC and players were allowed to sit there with their own copy of the MM's. </p><p></p><p>But PbP is very different as a player, imho. Plus, I'm not familiar with all the monster stats in the current version of D&D, so I don't intuitively know what monsters need THAC0. Now, not getting to see the combat rolls for the attacks that hit makes the game seem less real (currently playing 7 other PbP's and this is the only one where no rolls for combat are rolled on the forum), like I'm reading a story and not playing D&D. Seeing the rolls that hit allows me to get sense for how skilled or dangerous they are and brings the game to life for me. The monsters feel more interactive and less two-dimensional. </p><p></p><p>Even if we only saw the rolls that hit, I think it would be sufficient. Since you're rolling on another forum, I wouldn't need to see misses, or any opposing skill checks. Same with initiative, it's only rolled once by any opposing monster and largely irrelevant after the 1st round so I get nothing from seeing it. Certainly not a deal breaker, but it would make the game more enjoyable, from this end, imho. [/sblock]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arrowhawk, post: 5883149, member: 6679551"] [sblock=ooc]As a DM, I used to subscribe to the "roll behind the screen" philosophy for combat. I did it because I thought it made the game more interesting and more scary/unpredictable/dangerous. But that was back when no one talked about OOC/IC and players were allowed to sit there with their own copy of the MM's. But PbP is very different as a player, imho. Plus, I'm not familiar with all the monster stats in the current version of D&D, so I don't intuitively know what monsters need THAC0. Now, not getting to see the combat rolls for the attacks that hit makes the game seem less real (currently playing 7 other PbP's and this is the only one where no rolls for combat are rolled on the forum), like I'm reading a story and not playing D&D. Seeing the rolls that hit allows me to get sense for how skilled or dangerous they are and brings the game to life for me. The monsters feel more interactive and less two-dimensional. Even if we only saw the rolls that hit, I think it would be sufficient. Since you're rolling on another forum, I wouldn't need to see misses, or any opposing skill checks. Same with initiative, it's only rolled once by any opposing monster and largely irrelevant after the 1st round so I get nothing from seeing it. Certainly not a deal breaker, but it would make the game more enjoyable, from this end, imho. [/sblock] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Yedan's Troubleshooters
Top