Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9120964" data-attributes="member: 93670">Even if it's a &quot;mostly crap&quot; or one of those &quot;few gems&quot;.&nbsp; spamming 3-4 5th level spells every fight or two&nbsp; when those spells are designed under the assumption that a caster probably&nbsp; only gets 1-2 per long rest is pretty OTT.&nbsp; Also warlock gets stuff like EB &amp; invocations to make up for their low level gap in spellcasting but at higher levels they still have those things even after the gap is inverted (some even still improving). Wotc is designing packet7 high level warlock as if they are still low level warlocks&nbsp; rather than high level ones with high level warlock abilities.&nbsp; Heck, they even went back to the 2014 EB scaling by character level.&nbsp; That's noteworthy in this case because they even acknowledged the power of repeatedly mashing a button for the 5th level version of a spellin the video announcing it</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9120964, member: 93670"] Even if it's a "mostly crap" or one of those "few gems". spamming 3-4 5th level spells every fight or two when those spells are designed under the assumption that a caster probably only gets 1-2 per long rest is pretty OTT. Also warlock gets stuff like EB & invocations to make up for their low level gap in spellcasting but at higher levels they still have those things even after the gap is inverted (some even still improving). Wotc is designing packet7 high level warlock as if they are still low level warlocks rather than high level ones with high level warlock abilities. Heck, they even went back to the 2014 EB scaling by character level. That's noteworthy in this case because they even acknowledged the power of repeatedly mashing a button for the 5th level version of a spellin the video announcing it [/QUOTE]

Verification