• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

Cosmic Deity power levels in 5E...

dave2008

Legend
I just really dislike 4e. I felt the system was to different it didnt feel like actual DND. I also really didnt care for the art of their manuals either. It was almost too cartoony in a way.
I loved 4e, it was what brought me back to D&D, and it was potentially the best system for truly epic / immortal tier play. But not how WotC did it, just the general concept of swarm-minion-standard-elite-solo was great. UK and I even discussed super-solos and beyond back in the day.

The art, like most editions, was hit and miss. I mean have you looked at the 3e Epic Level Handbook? A lot of that art is pretty bad IMO. I always thought the 4e pic Orcus stuff was pretty good. Much it was WAR, so he hails from 3e art too.

1653325000162.png

1653325033890.png

1653325049430.png
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

I just really dislike 4e. I felt the system was to different it didnt feel like actual DND.

It was probably too radical a change for most people to accept.

I also really didnt care for the art of their manuals either. It was almost too cartoony in a way.

It was certainly an exaggerated style. One of my big problems with the current D&D monster art is that its far too 'soft-focus, twee, water coloured and non-threatening'...and while I know that's not every monster, its enough of them to establish an over-arching theme.
 

It was probably too radical a change for most people to accept.



It was certainly an exaggerated style. One of my big problems with the current D&D monster art is that its far too 'soft-focus, twee, water coloured and non-threatening'...and while I know that's not every monster, its enough of them to establish an over-arching theme.
I think I disagree. Maybe on a race basis or with giants but I feel that 5e (2nd place to 3.5 on art) has some of the most realistic styled art.
 

I think I disagree. Maybe on a race basis or with giants but I feel that 5e (2nd place to 3.5 on art) has some of the most realistic styled art.

I'm not a fan of that water-colour style. It was interesting looking at the 4E Orcus illustration that Dave posted above which has actual red skin, when I look through the 5E Monster Manual virtually everything that should be red is a soft, muted pink tone.

But everyone has their own ideas about art.
 

I'm not a fan of that water-colour style. It was interesting looking at the 4E Orcus illustration that Dave posted above which has actual red skin, when I look through the 5E Monster Manual virtually everything that should be red is a soft, muted pink tone.

But everyone has their own ideas about art.
I can respect that. I will give props to 4e on the demogorgan art since i cant read the name without picturing the two headed mandril they made for it.
 

dave2008

Legend
I'm not a fan of that water-colour style. It was interesting looking at the 4E Orcus illustration that Dave posted above which has actual red skin, when I look through the 5E Monster Manual virtually everything that should be red is a soft, muted pink tone.

But everyone has their own ideas about art.
Of course Orcus is supposed to have a bloated, white, decaying body. At least according to my 1e MM! ;)
 



dave2008

Legend
That what stands out to me the most is when art from a later gen of dnd is of a being much older leaves a near irreplaceable image in my head. Another example of media that has a similar effect is the MCU
Absolutely, but 4e Demogorgon was pretty similar to 3e Demogorgon (just brighter as UK pointed out)

3e
1653331879601.png

1653332075733.png

4e
1653331899729.png

I must admit that, though I miss the mandrill heads, I do like the 5e art:
1653332169426.png

1653332223812.png

1653332244900.png
 


Remove ads

Top