These apparently have the rights to do creative work using the art as part of the purchase agreement. I think. Which went along with the swiping of them. Four of them I guess.Now, hang on. NFTs are basically receipts -- in most cases, they don't have anything to do with property law, or copyrights. I have a suspicion neither Seth Green, nor the writer of the article knows how NFTs work or what they are (... which is how the scammers want it, of course), or there's something else going on here.
These apparently have the rights to do creative work using the art as part of the purchase agreement. I think. Which went along with the swiping of them. Four of them I guess.
I must agree with you about being confused. I don’t get it either. Maybe it’s a hoax/joke?That still doesn't make sense, though. If you can prove it was stolen, any problems with the contract (purchasing agreement) and IP rights should be fairly easy corrected. The NFT shouldn't even come up on the discussion. The law already knows how to deal with that sort of thing.
It may be because I'm from New Jersey, but I immediately assume some form of grift. Maybe the show needs a PR boost in visibility? This article is the first I've heard of it...I must agree with you about being confused. I don’t get it either. Maybe it’s a hoax/joke?