Clint_L
Legend
For me, it is the opposite. French toast are the simplest to make and are the thing I do when there is bread to use up. They are one step removed from making actual toast - mix is just milk, eggs, cinnamon and a touch of vanilla. Waffles are next because it is just basic pancake batter, no need to fold the eggs, thrown on a waffle iron. Fire and forget.I eat all three happily, and of those three, it’s most often pancakes, followed by waffles then FT. But that’s nothing to do with popularity.
For the record, I don’t consider them true substitutes for each other, either.
Pancakes are the easiest to find in restaurants and make at home. I believe they’re available in a wider variety of flavors. It’s even moreso if you include the thin flatbreads from other cultures that are often called pancakes, like the ones served with mu shu pork. So I eat them more often than the other 2 combined.
Waffles, OTOH, hold toppings- especially butter-better than either of the others, thanks to those nifty little pockets.
FT is usually more subtle & refined in my experience, and is one of the options I look for if I’m having breakfast in an upscale facility.
Pancakes are the family tradition and good ones take a bit of finesse. Buttermilk goes without saying. I separate the eggs and whip the whites, gently folding them in so that the pancakes are crispy on the outside but fluffy within. And you have to cook bacon first to get the fat.
Pre-mix pancakes horrify me.
Toppings can change the equation - maple syrup is great with all of them, but a simple sauteed apple or pear topping goes great with french toast, strawberries and whipped cream are the classic waffle pairing at our home, and my favourite with pancakes is a homemade raspberry sauce.
I’ve never had waffles with chicken - the concept seems weird to me but I know it’s a southern classic so I’d like to try it.
Last edited: