Recent content by pascale

You exceeded the CMD by 11, not 15 therefor the hob is only going back 10'.

"Hobgoblin 1 flies 5 feet for the combat maneuver succeeding plus an extra 5 feet for every 5 points over his combat maneuver defense (CMD). CMC 29 - CMD 20 = 9 points over his CMD. The total distance he is moved back is 10 feet. Hobgoblin 2. CMC 31 - CMD 20 = 11. The total distance he is moved...

I may also want to post a rule that i came up with for whatever reason and it is part of a larger collection of rules that I wish to publish and sell. I still wouldn't want anyone redistributing that for profit or not with out my concent. But I would find value in discussing it - getting ideas...

Firstly I do still play D&D 4e I just perfer pathfinder. No as for those simmiliarities that I noticed, they are just that simmiliarities, I'm not making a case that 4e = wow or anything silly like that. I am saying that I have noticed a few simmiliarities. for instances the rules for...

I find this interesting. As a casual observer of WoW I notice the simmiliarities right away. (Treasure parcels, marking/agro, recharge times on powers, perception/surprise rules - monster sight radiouse, the artwork, etc) But actually hardcore players say they don't see it. Now I say I'm a...

Pathfinder is awsome sauce. I've been wanting to play one for some time, but can not find a DM for it. I DM a PF eberron game, and joking threaten to kill off the players so that one them can take over DMing, and I can play a Pathfinder chronicaller...lol. Enjoy your game and good luck.

It is still good idea, and one that likely predates Mearls by a lot. I can't I'm surprised that WotC is recyling this as they have doing that since they began as a company. I am however, a little confused. I though situations like were what page 42 in the DMG 1 were for? Or is in the DMG 2...

I'd like to see it keep the encounter based balancing that Tob and the powers system brought with it. However i want a more modual less restrictive system, like 3.5/pathfinders multiclassing. I want them to have many many options, the more the better. The system should be able to do any and...

I agree that ToH is the anti-thesis of 4e. And the system, as designed and released, simply won't be able to do justice to ToH. I have resigned myself to having to house-rule-DM-foo to get the feel and spirit of ToH right. I still want to do as fiathful a job translating ToH properly, which...

Still down last time i checked....5:10 AST

I thought about doing this, but then it wouldn't make much sense for a heroic tier party to be going after a demi lich...although that would be in Tohs spirit....

So as the tittle sugests I'm updating Tome of hoorors to 4e. (No I don't really want to wait for WotC to do it for me.) And while the DCs for the checks remian about as difficult. The damage comes out in 4e a bit underwleming. I'm using the 3.5 update as a rough guide for what I should be...

No. the DM is fallable. Just becuase your the DM does mean that you are no longer capable of making a mistake or gettng a rules call wrong. Your human and all humans make mistakes. Rule zero, and having the final say is not the smae as always right. It means that whether you are right or...

PrCs like theurge, and arcane trickster. They didn't. I still use fractual attacks and saves as house though. This is more of campaign/player/DM issue then a system. Though spells should be used as the rare powerful abilities that they are. If they just happen to fall off trees or...