Search results

Improved Invisibility on any character capable of 20+ dmg per hit. Everyone else stays out of the room/chamber. If you're not 'visible' the cage shouldn't be animated, only an object, presumably with the same hardness. Beat it to death without fear of counter attacks.

I guess you have to ask yourself what is the point of having house rules. For me, it has to be something that is easily remembered and either adds fun to the game or changes something that upsets my group’s verisimilitude. If, as you say, you “don’t think it will even be missed” then to me it’s...

You can still download the playtest from the Paizo site. http://paizo.com/store/downloads/pathfinder/pathfinderRPG/v5748btpy8daf&source=search

Not quite. You must decide to use the feat (and take the AC penalty) before you make any attacks.

I hate to say anyone is playing the game 'wrong' since its such a customizable game but I do disagree with a dm that uses the "BAB and abilities of our toughest melee fighter as his barometer for the enemy's AC" Otherwise I agree with Haffrung, the guy with the highest attack bonus should hit...

Me too, only I've also added rules for the artificer and psionics.

I only have the first printing of both books, but the PDFs I have were revised once and it wasn't changed in them or in the PFSRD. I agree it needs to be more accessible for sure. Thanks for doing the research and finding the FAQ. Its good to have the official word from Paizo.

I understand all that. I'm not questioning the natural weapon attack penalty but the weapon/unarmed penalty. The part of the PFSRD you emphasized is in conflict with the part of the PFSRD that says: "Creatures with natural attacks and attacks made with weapons can use both as part of a full...

Thats not the way I read it. The quote you mention says "weapons and unarmed strikes". Unarmed strikes are not the same as natural attacks. Also the Beastiary pg302 says when you fight with weapons and natural attacks you "attack with their weapons normally but treat all of their natural...

Considering what LCD TVs, Computers and even cell phones cost today verses just two years ago, I'll wait for version 3.7 and pick it up for at most $200 with or without mail-in rebate.

Tiers, what a great idea. But we'd need a new name. We couldn't call them prestige. Oh, I know how about Paragon. Wait. I think somebody else already did that. ;) and that.

Dark Sun next year would be awesome, it was my favorite 2e setting.

Oh, I'm not saying they are a bad thing. No I love to read the cheese they put out. I'm just saying it seems like a lot of people (on the boards) seem to think that you can't 'win' at D&D without the cheese and I refuse to believe that thats the way the majority of home games are actually...

Ah yes the Character Op Boards. Well thats ONE way to play the game.

A 10th level caster can't do all those. Divine Metamagic is fine, no banning required. It costs turn attempts to use, 7 each for persistant spell. So if your player wants to burn all their feats on extra turning then they could get all of those persistant around 18th level (earlier based on...

Yea, there would definitely have to be some common sense applied to a couple specific powers. I guess my main beef is that out of 17 classes only 2 can use ranged weapons. (and by ‘can use’ I mean with a power not just a basic attack)

Most of the Ranger & Rogue ranged weapon powers are just as powerful as most of the other classes melee weapon powers though. The problem is that ONLY Rangers and Rogues get them. If I want to play another class I either have to use a melee weapon or a magic stick. Not sure what your implying...

I’m contemplating a houserule and was wondering what the minds here at EN World think about it. Mainly I’m looking for unexpected side-effects and possible consequences I haven’t thought of. My houserule has to due with powers that have the ‘weapon’ keyword. All these powers specify either a...

To me that been one of my problems with 4e in general. If you’re not an idiot savant, you suck at your class. Sure you can choose to be a well-rounded character but the feel of the current edition discourages that. As for the original post, is a party without an Int-based PC screwed? Yes, but...

So I was reading over the Bard and it does seem pretty cool. One thing thats been bugging me though. They get simple and military ranged weapons but not one of thier powers uses ranged weapons. Has anyone figured that out yet? I guess you can multiclass to pick something up but it seems strange.