Another Delve Into Xanathar's Guide To Everything

Xanathar's Guide to Everything packs a lot of useful content for both players and DMs in its 192 pages. Here I'm going to expand on the first part of my review to cover the section that will probably be used the most by its readers – character options.

Xanathar's Guide to Everything packs a lot of useful content for both players and DMs in its 192 pages. Here I'm going to expand on the first part of my review to cover the section that will probably be used the most by its readers – character options.

XanatharAlt_ProductShot.jpg

The Player's Handbook defines classes as a calling that affects the player's world view, not just a job. So while a fighter is a "master of martial combat," the paladin is a "holy warrior bound to a sacred oath" and the ranger is "a warrior who uses martial prowess and natural magic to combat threats on the edge of civilization."

Subclasses begin with "a character-defining choice at 1st, 2nd, or 3rd level that unlock features not available to the class as a whole. The subclass chart in XGtE illustrates briefly how these features also affect the character's purpose and world view. For example, the Gloom Stalker Ranger is "unafraid of the dark, relentlessly stalks and ambushes foes" while the Horizon Walker "finds portals to other worlds and channels planar magic" and the Monster Slayer "hunts down creatures of the night and wielders of grim magic."

The Barbarian subclass options in XGtE provide more variety than the ones in the PHB or Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide. The PHB had the Berserker and Totem Warrior. SCAG added additional totem options for the latter and the Battlerager, which was essentially a Berserker customized for Dwarves.

The three Primal Path options in XGtE add true variety. The Ancestral Guardian Primal Path is geared toward defending others than charging into battle. The Path of the Storm Herald creates a Barbarian whose powers are Thor (or other storm god) inspired. It's likely to be a player favorite because causing lightning damage to your opponents is always fun. Affects of the storm aura even vary by terrain – desert, sea or tundra.

The Path of the Zealot is a sort of divinely empowered Barbarian. The name goes against what I typically think of as barbarian characteristics, but that's just me. Players are more likely to be disappointed that the 3rd level ability simply means that spells used to raise the Zealot Barbarian from the dead do not need material spell components. In comparison to things like the Storm Herald Barbarian's Storm Aura at 3rd level, it does seem like a weaker feature. However, they also get Divine Fury at the same level, dealing extra damage to the first creature hit on each turn with a weapon.

The Bard Colleges in SCAG provided more flavor than practical benefits. The three presented in XGtE actually make me want to play a bard.

The College of Glamour is inspired by the Feywild, where its practitioners either honed their abilities or trained under those who did. Its abilities are geared toward influence and appearance. The College of Swords is more daring-do in flavor. Players who want a character akin to Syrio Forel, the water dancer from A Game of Thrones will like this option. My only complaint is having to choose between dueling and two-weapon fighting at 3rd level, though I understand the reason for it from a game design perspective. I just want a duel using a two-weapon fighting style.

I like the College of Whispers both thematically and mechanically. Bards who act as spies and specialize in manipulation find a home in this category.

However, the subclass description suggests that members of this college hide their true nature to avoid bias from others and to better use their skills of infiltration. From a story standpoint, that makes perfect sense. In actual play, it's very difficult because even parties that try not to metagame are going to notice the difference between the player's statements of action to the DM versus what is said in-game. There are ways around it, but in my experience they only last so long. When any class description suggests that a character try to hide what they are, I'd like to see the class features offer a way to do that in game with some sort of misdirection or concealment ability.

The PHB gave clerics seven domains to start with, and the Dungeon Master's Guide added the Death Domain for NPCs (or at DM's discretion for players). SCAG added the Arcane Domain. XGtE adds the Forge and Grave Domains.

Anyone glossing over the Forge Domain, assuming it's boring, would be missing out. While gods of the forge might be seen as having more of a supplementary role, their clerics are able to use their abilities to increase weapon damage, improve armor and, eventually, withstand fire and non-magical weapon attacks.

The Grave Domain was mostly created to appease players whose DM's did not allow the Death Domain (or Adventurer's League players since AL forbids both the Death Domain Cleric and Oathbreaker Paladin). Don't mistake that as being a weaker version of the original. The Grave Domain has its own formidable abilities, such as the 2nd level Path to the Grave, which allows the cleric to curse a creature with a vulnerability to damage by yourself or an ally.

Druids get two new subclasses – Circle of Dreams and Circle of the Shepherd. The former is influenced by the Feywild so it focuses more on hidden pathways, creating havens for healing and dreamwalking.

Thematically, I love Circle of the Shepherd, but something about the features feel less inspiring. Characters can speak to beasts, though it doesn't automatically convey friendship or control of them. The list of spirits that can be called – hawk, bear and unicorn – also feels a bit skimpy. As a DM, I might tweak this subclass a bit, though I haven't decided how yet.

In the PHB, Fighter subclass options were the Champion, which focused on raw power, the Battle Master, which was more of a tactician, and the Eldritch Knight, who could cast spells. XGtE adds the Arcane Archer, Cavalier and Samurai. The first is likely to be the most popular. Who doesn't love magical arrows and similar stunts? The other two classes were discussed previously.

The Monk's Way of the Sun Soul allows characters to channel ki into bolts of light. While thematically very different from the Storm Herald Barbarian, there are some commonalities from a feature standpoint, which makes perfect sense. The Way of the Drunken Master was described in my prior XGtE article. The Way of the Kensei focuses on weapon mastery.

Xanathar_KeyArt.png

Much like how the Grave Domain appeals to those who want to play Death Domain Clerics, the Oath of Conquest Paladins seem designed to appease Oathbreaker Paladin fans. Conquest Paladins might even worship archdevils for their harsh infliction of law. Oath of Redemption Paladins are the exact opposite and the closest 5th Edition has come to the pacifist cleric. These paladins can and will fight creatures like undead, devils, etc., but their primary abilities are protective.

Gloom Stalkers are rangers for the Underdark, though they're not limited to that. Delving into shadow to fight evil is their purpose. Monster Slayers are complements to Gloom Stalkers by seeking out evil fey, vampires, and other magical threats. Horizon Walkers explore the multiverse and protect against planar threats.

Rogues get the most subclasses at four, though two of them – Mastermind and Swashbuckler – are carried over from SCAG due to AL's "PHB +1" rule for character creation. The Inquisitive Rogue is geared toward Sherlock Holmes (or Moriarty) type characters.

The Scout is such a classic Rogue variant I'm surprised it wasn't in the PHB. XGtE does a nice job of distinguishing this wilderness character mechanically from rangers.

For Sorcerers, Storm Sorcery also carries over from the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide. Shadow Magic is the other addition. Unlike most of the others, it gets two abilities at 1st level and none at 3rd with one of those abilities making it a little tougher to kill them. Hound of Ill Omen summons a creature a darkness. I'm confident players are going to enjoy that ability.

Warlocks get a wider range of Eldritch Invocations in XGtE, plus the Celestial and Hexblade options. Players and GMs familiar with the Blackrazor sword, which is even featured in one of the story options for Betrayal at Baldur's Gate, will recognize the latter.

War Wizards are mentioned in SCAG but only get a full class option in XGtE. They were discussed more thoroughly in part one of the Xanathar review.

As someone who has been DMing 5th edition since the first public play tests, the class options in XGtE make me really want to switch to playing. Each enriches the PHB options thoughtfully, widening game options for players and DMs, especially when combined with the "This Is Your Life" section and class background options in the same chapter.

Note that errata for XGtE is being compiled at the bottom of the page for Xanathar’s Guide to Everything though as of this writing, only two items are cited.

contributed by Beth Rimmels
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Beth Rimmels

Beth Rimmels


log in or register to remove this ad


Istbor

Dances with Gnolls
Sure, but what I want to do is split up the talk so things become clear.

Instead of saying "more crunch comes slowly", let's talk about "wide" and "deep" crunch separately.

Like this:

Wide crunch, like subclasses, comes slowly.

Deep crunch, like prestige classes, comes... not at all. Zilch. Nada. Not even at "a glacial pace", not. At. All.

Whether you like it or not you should at least be able to agree this is a more representative description of the pace so far.

Just saying "more crunch is coming in a slower, thought out pace" doesn't tell the full story. That is all.


Sent from my C6603 using EN World mobile app

Sure. I have no real argument against that. I don't necessarily disagree.

Like, I enjoyed the talk about prestige classes, and the direction they were hinting at in the UA. I submitted my survey that I liked it and would like to maybe see more in the same vein. Unfortunately, is seems the majority of survey takers did not really agree with my thoughts.

It isn't what I would consider ideal, just the current reality. Not to say that this reality isn't subject to changing. For all I know, the next crunch book could be all options like the type we see lacking here.
 

Connorsrpg

Adventurer
[MENTION=12731]CapnZapp[/MENTION]

I understand where you are going, but don't think 5E core is going to do that... and I don't think it should (yet). Having an easy, basic core games without too many decision points is 5E's strength. :)

But, if you are like me, and it sounds like you might be ;), you love messing with things and you like more choice. :) I can see these being done by 3rd parties and for specific settings (when WotC get around to those). That is probably where you will see more specific rule variants etc.

(In meantime, have a look around my website if you wish... we have lots of variations, additions, etc: http://connorscampaigns.wikidot.com/. Look under D&D and ALL in side nav bar :)).
 


Yes it was. If future books reprint things that I already bought in this edition in order to work around some AL rule? Then I will simply not be buying them.

So if they release a supplement that you would find pretty useful at your table in various ways, but reprints, say, one or two of the cantrips from SCAG, you'll refuse to buy it simply because of that?
 

That was a very poor decision on WotC's part.
No it's not, it's a good rule. It means the designers of future D&D products can design new character features without worrying if feature X will be overpowered if combined with Y from Drizzt's Guide to killing stuff and Z from Raistlin's Guide to Magic.
 

ccs

41st lv DM
So if they release a supplement that you would find pretty useful at your table in various ways, but reprints, say, one or two of the cantrips from SCAG, you'll refuse to buy it simply because of that?

If their intent is to work around their own dumbass AL rules then yes, I will. And I will tell them about it in their surveys.

And if the info I'm missing out on is useful enough? I won't even have to pirate it - because you'll all talk about it enough that I can replicate it at least as well as WoTC wrote it in the 1st place.

Now if the reprint is because they are collecting bits & pieces of stuff they've scattered throughout various products into one convenient book? Fine.
For ex: Given that each adventure (Tyranny of Dragons, Strahd, Tomb of Annihilation, etc) has a section of new monsters, eventually they'll have enough to justify a compilation book. That'd I buy as I'm not going to spend $50 on adventures I'm never going to use just for Tiamats stat block. Or the page or two from Abyss that gives me Demogorgan & whoever. But if all this stuff were in 1 book (call it MM2)....
 

gyor

Legend
No it's not, it's a good rule. It means the designers of future D&D products can design new character features without worrying if feature X will be overpowered if combined with Y from Drizzt's Guide to killing stuff and Z from Raistlin's Guide to Magic.

There will not be enough books for that to become a major issue, this is an idea designed for more industrous editions like 2e, 3e, and 4e, Not a slow going, barely supported edition, where it is absolutely unneeded, its fighting yesterday battles based on a conversation Mearl's over heard years ago.
 

gyor

Legend
If their intent is to work around their own dumbass AL rules then yes, I will. And I will tell them about it in their surveys.

And if the info I'm missing out on is useful enough? I won't even have to pirate it - because you'll all talk about it enough that I can replicate it at least as well as WoTC wrote it in the 1st place.

Now if the reprint is because they are collecting bits & pieces of stuff they've scattered throughout various products into one convenient book? Fine.
For ex: Given that each adventure (Tyranny of Dragons, Strahd, Tomb of Annihilation, etc) has a section of new monsters, eventually they'll have enough to justify a compilation book. That'd I buy as I'm not going to spend $50 on adventures I'm never going to use just for Tiamats stat block. Or the page or two from Abyss that gives me Demogorgan & whoever. But if all this stuff were in 1 book (call it MM2)....

I agree with you 100%, I'm only really buying XGTE because it's the only real player supplement well 75% player supplement, as the player parts of both the SCAG and VGTM were after thoughts put in place to give options thirsty .players are reason to buy them.

Still I doubt I buy anymore books in the future, I have the VGTM and XGTE (once delivers it), so there is no reason to buy anymore player supplements I can't use. The PHB +1 rule is going to be a disaster in the one term.

4e Living Forgotten Realms was similarly restrictive at first as well, but eventually they had to dump that rule and eventually so will AL.

Those that defend this rule and argue it hasn't been a problem ignore the fact that till now there really hasn't been any new player content of significance, just small amounts, but now between XGTE and the Planar Book coming out, and more to come in following years, admittedly a trickle compared to other editions, the AL rule will really start to cause problems, from pushing reprinting of materials, to giving players a good reason not to buy new books to stuff I haven't for seen.

Also the rule means no Eldarin Circle of Shepherd or Circle of Dreams or College Glamour. It means no Aasimar Divine Souls, Zealots,,The Celestial Warlocks, Forge Clerics, Grave Clerics, Oath of Redemption Paladins, or Fallen Aasimar Oath of Conquest Paladins.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top