Watus said:
I'm willing to entertain the possibility, but I do have questions... Geneered by whom and to what end? Would this make them someone else's property? Is there precedent for that in the Whedonverse? It's not ringing any bells...
Um, not sure. Not sure. Not sure. Rhun!
I've never actually seen Firefly, just heard alot about it and the characters. So I honestly have no idea as to where there is any precedent.
An alternative to geneering would be something along the lines of a corporation specialising in security and covert operations. It 'adopts' orhpans and raises them to fullfill operational roles. In some ways like a ninja clan; the children are taken young (around 5-7 years old), trained and indoctrinated into a culture of service and loyalty.
Another option would be a Gibson Cyberpunk/Japan Inc corporate family model, where employment is for life, employees are housed and their children eduacted by the corporation. Aptitude tests are used from an early age to stream the children from an early age to groom them for their future life as a corporate citizen.
Neither of these models would mean that the character is property as such, but would mean that if they are operating independently, there is probably a corperation somewhere who considers them deserters of a sort. Of course, they might *not* be operating independently
My impression of the setting is that is a fairly dangerous and factious place, one of totalitarian governments and restricted human rights, a la:
.... where no one goes hungry and your every move is monitored for your own protection. Star Trek it ain't. Time to do somoe background reading I think.
thotd