My guess would be that, in addition to the anti-sex limitations, there are anti-gore limitations, to avoid people being able to generate images of blood and guts and the like.Perhaps punching is acceptable but using an actual weapon is not. (Similar to how I can have a character point a gun at the viewer but not a sword or axe.)
EDIT: See?
Prompt: Modern comic book style. An action shot of a pale freckled short squat robust athletic ginger-haired green-eyed fantasy dwarf woman angrily hitting an evil wizard with her battleaxe. The dwarf wears blocky geometric metal and leather fantasy armor with black chainmail tights, a crimson cloak, and smooth brown deerskin boots. Backdrop is a blurred muddy field beneath a stormy sky.
I gave it three goes with the same prompt. The results:
View attachment 334102 View attachment 334101 View attachment 334106 View attachment 334115 View attachment 334117 View attachment 334099 View attachment 334100 View attachment 334116 View attachment 334103 View attachment 334104 View attachment 334105 View attachment 334118
As you can see, she's either threatening him with the axe, kicking him with her foot, or threatening the camera man while the wizard lurks behind her. It doesn't appear to want to show her actually hitting him with the axe.
Yeah, that's my assumption as well. That being said, it does sometimes generate blood and guts all on its own!My guess would be that, in addition to the anti-sex limitations, there are anti-gore limitations, to avoid people being able to generate images of blood and guts and the like.
A punch can only really like...break a bone or bloody someone's face. An axe can decapitate or dismember or disembowel. Menacing someone with the axe is thus the "safe" equivalent of actually hitting them with it.
Yep, it does that and spontaneous nudity when you are not even trying.Yeah, that's my assumption as well. That being said, it does sometimes generate blood and guts all on its own!
Yep, it does that and spontaneous nudity when you are not even trying.