Bront said:I know one currently semi-shapeless elf...
I concur. There is a reason that this type of prerequisite isn't usually used, namely the oddities that have already been pointed out.Erekose13 said:Got that right!
I like the pre-req's Velmont has suggested.
Bront said:Technicaly, though saying it this way means that someone with a con of 6 could potentialy not get the benifit of the feat at a given level if he rolls low enough.
Also, I was trying to make it different for anti-plagerism reasons.