Hey guys!
Anabstercorian said:
d20 logo? Yes, absolutely.
Hmm, I think I'll have to go over the document again as per jmucchiello's advice before I do.
Serge said:
Upper Krust, it's about time. All I can say is:
SUPERB!!!!!
One of my moderators (Kain Darkwind) was kind enough to buy a copy of it for me and I'll be doing a review of the Immortals' Handbook for Dicefreaks. I want to encourage our members to buy it as I think it's a great bit of work. Some of the pictures (all done by yourself, yes?) are evocative!
Well done!
Thanks again Serge matey! Yes I did all the art myself, for better or worse. I would have prefered to hire Wayne Reynolds but beggars can't be choosers I suppose. I don't think I have mastered the art (no pun intended) of making things look epic yet, but I am quite proud of the achievement, and especially the cover. I don't think I am back to my best yet (I hadn't painted since 1995 before tackling the cover), but I am only going to get better with practice.
I'll try and spend a bit more time on dicefreaks in the future, Kain lured me in last week talking about nukes in d20. But I think I had to abscond before things were settled.
jmucchiello said:
Some free advice. Do not put the d20 logo on your cover unless you follow all of the guidelines required by the d20 license. Your cover does not have any of the Manditory Trademark Use text on it and that would violate the license.
Well I thought I was following all the guidelines, but you have given me pause on the matter.
jmucchiello said:
Likewise, based on the table of contents you are already in violation since you claim to be using version 3.0 of the d20 license. The d20 license is up to version 6 and you aren't allowed to release new material with an older copy of that license. On the same page you state that Dungeon Master is a trademark of WotC. While true, this violates the d20 license.
I'll have to go tidy that up.
jmucchiello said:
And I don't like your OGC declaration because the last line is (in my and other's opinions) not a clear declaration. But that is an esoteric OGL arguement that I don't want to debate in this forum. It does mean though that I am less interested in purchasing IH than I was before though.
Well I presume you don't mean the 'work of fiction' line, and are refering to the line about making copies? If so I'll remove that line and do another incarnation (Version 1.2) tonight. I'm going to have to update the license anyway, can't have that hanging.
jmucchiello said:
Did any PDF publishers ask about publishing the IH for you?
I was in negotiations with a few, but things fell through for whatever reason, so I just decided to self-publish the Bestiary first (or at least part of it) and then, with something to show for myself, see if any publishers were interested in the actual Immortals Handbook itself or other similar products.
jmucchiello said:
I never did because there were other publishers who were more active in your IH threads.
I'd certainly prefer to work with an established publisher rather than have to do everything myself, as you have noted I'm not one hundred percent up to scratch on the legal side of things, and the online aspect has been a learning process in truth.
jmucchiello said:
But you've made a bunch of rookie mistakes with the license that could have easily been avoided.
Well I am a rookie, but I take your point. Thanks for your advice, very much appreciated.
Frukathka said:
Shew, about time! I'll get payment out for it as soon as I possibly can. Thanks UK! Looking forward to the complete printed project!
I appreciate the support mate. As for a print version, I suppose that will depend on whether the pdfs are successful enough to merit publisher interest.
historian said:
U_K's work is really amazing. Every time that I open the file I catch something new.
As long as its not new mistakes.
historian said:
In no particular order, here are some of my favorite tidbits in the Bestiary:
*SNIP*
...yeah, but everybody loves the Neutronium Golem so that one doesn't count.
...oh and don't think I didn't get that Grigori wink you cheeky rascal.
Kerrick said:
Just looked over the preview pages... I'm glad you didn't use the new statblock format.
Why not? I think it looks kind of fresh and clean.
Kerrick said:
It means I'll probably pick this one up. Also, the font is very hard to read... the headers are night unto impossible to decipher. Just a minor gripe, but something you might want to keep in mind for next time.
Aw, c'mon, that font is king! It combines upper and lower case letters in the same way that the Immortals Handbook encapsulates the mortal-Immortal relationship.
Alzrius said:
This power didn't get a listing that I saw. It was only mentioned in the Seraphim's Ray of Redemption power.
Apostasy is the power to transcend alignment. With it, a chaotic evil deity could take Paladin Levels, or you could be a Monk-Bard and so forth. It also means a Paladin could cast evil spells. It means that you are immune to the effects of aligned-based weapons and spells.
By the way, just incase things were not totally clear, the d20 Hit Dice signifies Demigod+, d100 Hit Dice signifies Elder One/Cosmic power, d1000 Hit Dice signifies Transcendental Level Beings/Time Lords and so forth. These abilities are in the Immortals Handbook, there are prerequisites for getting the d20 Hit Dice, depending on starting Hit Dice type. I have a new type of epic toughness that increases dice type from d4 to d6 to d8 to d10 to d12. So its not technically automatic for immortals, although it would be for those without Class Levels and only Hit Dice.
...I actually got the idea indirectly from the Paragon Template in the ELH. It gives +12 hit point bonus per Hit Dice and I was just thinking that with maximum hit points for a d8 creature, thats the same as a maxed d20.
Lastly, as jmucchiello has intimated, it looks like I should update the d20 license, so while I am doing that I may as well fix the errata, so if you find anymore by tonight let me know.
Currently the spotted errata is:
1. Maskim's alignment should be Lawful Evil
2. Sadims subname should be Greedy One as it is in the contents.
3. The Flagas entry in the Monsters by CR & ECL list is wonky.