Every major rules debate on this forum should involve someone putting up their avatar or signature or they must back down from their position!Well this definitely is more entertaining than a normal rules debate
Every major rules debate on this forum should involve someone putting up their avatar or signature or they must back down from their position!Well this definitely is more entertaining than a normal rules debate
Every major rules debate on this forum should involve someone putting up their avatar or signature or they must back down from their position!
Thanks folks
In response to Draco pointing out Lightning Rush, I'll just say...
(1) A Defender shouldn't have to wait until Level 7 to be good at their job, and
(2) A psionic defender shouldn't have to use up one of their three at-wills to be good at their job.
I dunno; the other defenders do pretty well right out of the gate. He's below any of them at low level, by a pretty wide margin.1) He's waiting until level 7 to make up for other players who are bad at -their- job.
Naah. Class features are to make a Defender be a good Defender. Blurred Step is a class feature; Lightning Rush is not. His defending competency should not cost him 33% of his entire At Will and Encounter selection.2) Oh contraire. At-wills are for exactly that purpose.
Wardens' class features work to pull enemies back into melee, Mr. Hasselhoff. Not one of their powers.Battleminds are -equally- as sticky as a Warden. Wardens have the same 'gotta be in melee to be worth a damn' restriction and they have the tools to get the job done just fine. Blurred Step as a free action isn't 'what they need to be fixed.' That goes a little too far.
Wardens' class features work to pull enemies back into melee, Mr. Hasselhoff. Not one of their powers.
-O
When evaluating a class you do not stop evaluating when you read "Level 1 At-Will Disciplines".