Speaking as a hardcore 4E Fan, never blame the majority for the outbursts of the vocal minority.Note the Op is one of the hardcore 4E fans hence why he is basically trolling.
Which is good advice in any walk of life. =D
Speaking as a hardcore 4E Fan, never blame the majority for the outbursts of the vocal minority.Note the Op is one of the hardcore 4E fans hence why he is basically trolling.
It's just an illustration of the logical fallacy of appealing to tradition or common practice. It's not that always playing the same imbalanced game the same unfair way is necessarily injurious to all or even some involved, let alone ethically bankrupt or morally repugnant, it's merely not proof that the game is already perfect.
I have a college buddy I visit in Texas every year, and we always play a couple of chess games; it's become a tradition. We're pretty well matched.
Sometimes I think about going out and improving my chess game. I'm sure that I could get significantly better with just a moderate amount of study. But then those games wouldn't be well matched any more, and I'd have lessened my enjoyment of them for the sake of building up a skill that benefits me not at all.
Sometimes there is value in *not* getting better.
An honorable mention is the Paladin 6 / sorcerer 5 who can use
Two attack with great sword 2d6 + 10 avg 26
+ enough smite to fuel one big combats, and one honest combat.
5d8 4 Times
4d8 3 Times
3d8 3 Times
2d8 4 Times.
The best smiting round can be
26 + 10d8 for 61 and you can add +7 if he use hunter mark. 68.
This is still under the fighter with action surge who can deals 39 x 2 for 78.
This Paladin is better with short adventure day, otherwise he get tired soon.
Takes a while to get going the Sorlock is decent from level 3 or so.
Note the Op is one of the hardcore 4E fans hence why he is basically trolling.