Parmandur
Book-Friend
Look, we know the Ranger is a simulation of Aragorn, from the testimony of an eyewitness. Not sure why you want to keep beating this silly drum, but facts are facts.
D&D 5E Why D&D is not (just) Tolkien
Sacrosanct
Legend
Old Geezer is Mike Mornard. Many of us who have been on the internet in fantasy forums more than a couple years know who he is, and his background. Outside of Joe Fischer himself making a comment, this is as about as close as you can get. It is definitive proof that the ranger class was made because Joe wanted to play Aragorn.
L
lowkey13
Guest
*Deleted by user*
Shadowdweller00
Adventurer
*cough* Balrog-Balor-type 6 demon *cough*?
I suppose I find the lack of apparent recognition for the ranger/huntsman/woodsman as a prior fantasy archetype to be obnoxious. And I find certain arguments to be...specious. Which does not necessarily make the thesis wrong.
Last edited:
Salamandyr
Adventurer
And strangely enough, the Type VI demon has really low hit dice compared to his underlings. Not so fearsome after all!
Parmandur
Book-Friend
The argument of eyewitness accounts, or the blow by blow similarities between the concepts? It really is quite obvious.
Mistwell
Crusty Old Meatwad (he/him)
You can read the Aero hobbies thief class, since Dungeons and Beavers (the CalTech guys) used it. It's the same system, all Gary did was change it to a percentile basis, and change when you got access to the abilities. But it's the same abilities. No "inspiration" other than he wrote down what the guys told him over the phone, and then made some minor modifications. He even said directly that yes, he got it from them.
It's not so different. It's the same, he just changed it from always working and gaining them over levels, to percentile basis. There is no literary source. The guys from Aero hobbies invented that purely as a kit-bash on the caster. I think it was one of those, "OK we need a new ability here to replace this caster slot, what would a thief be able to do?" sort of situations. There's no literary source, and Gary was not involved in choosing those abilities.
Thank Gawd Gary did not do a straight Tolkien game because that would have been awful but even saying that
As DnD is focused essentially on the Players having characters that are all Tolkien races that is a huge influence. If it had been based on Howards work, for example, then everyone would be different types of Human.
As DnD is focused essentially on the Players having characters that are all Tolkien races that is a huge influence. If it had been based on Howards work, for example, then everyone would be different types of Human.
L
lowkey13
Guest
*Deleted by user*
Hussar
Legend
Oh, and let's not forget the old 1e Racial Relations chart as well. Pulled pretty much verbatim from Tolkien. I mean, without referencing Tolkien, explain why elves and dwarves don't like each other? Both strongly good races that share no territory (thus have no reason to be in conflict). Yet they really don't like each other. Why? Because Tolkien.
Count me in the camp of thinking Tolkien's influence on D&D is pretty far reaching. Not a real stretch of an opinion apparently with 50% thinking that Tolkien has a pretty strong influence.
Count me in the camp of thinking Tolkien's influence on D&D is pretty far reaching. Not a real stretch of an opinion apparently with 50% thinking that Tolkien has a pretty strong influence.
Similar Threads
