Changeover poll

[ProfessorCirno]

Erm, actually, I think they measure success by how many books they sell.

As I've already pointed out at least once in this thread, me voting 'Never tried 4E, all earlier edition play' doesn't mean I'm not buying the books. I'm buying them even though I don't currently play 4E and probably won't for quite a while.

I doubt I'm the only one.

As I've said in other threads, I think 4e will be made or broken depending on long term success.

 

[meomwt]

We hit 900 votes!

Almost at those magical four figures now...

 

[Edena_of_Neith]

902 votes! We're almost there! (to 1,000 votes) : )

The results are as follows, changed again:

Changeover: 37%
Partial Changover: 14%
No Changeover: 49%

 

[Edena_of_Neith]

We only need 93 more votes, and we're there.

 

[cangrejoide]

We only need 93 more votes, and we're there.

Is this really necessary?

It has been proven that the poll has been rigged, so whats the point?

 

[scruffygrognard]

It really sucks that people would rig the poll to support their game preference. It's in very bad form.

 

[cangrejoide]

It really sucks that people would rig the poll to support their game preference. It's in very bad form.

It just not sucks, but is rather stupid to think that this poll would actually have any importance or influence so that it would have to be rigged.

 

[jadrax]

I wonder if it is possible to post polls that are not anonymous on these forums?

 

[cangrejoide]

I don't play online games so I have no experience with them, but I somehow find that doubtful. WoW hasn't lost half of it's users...

And who says WOTC did?

 

[Delta]

It has been proven that the poll has been rigged, so whats the point?

I think I saw evidence that the poll was riggable. No one offered proof that the poll has been rigged.