Monte Cook reviews Kobold Quarterly

[rich pett]

I thought some of you would be interested in seeing his thoughts on the small but mighty kobold.

The Chapel Perilous -

Monte pays particular attention to #6 and #7. Obviously you're all welcome over at KQs website for a chat anytime.

Kobold Quarterly

Hoorah and up her majesty!

Rich

 

[MichaelSomething]

What does he mean by Mona-era Dragon? That's an intresting term.

 

[Khuxan]

What does he mean by Mona-era Dragon? That's an intresting term.

The time when Eric Mona was the chief editor of Dragon Magazine.

 

[VictorC]

The time when Eric Mona was the chief editor of Dragon Magazine.

Ahh the time I liked it the least.

 

[Darrin Drader]

I agree with every word in Monte's review. I haven't subscribed yet because I'm waiting to see which way Wolfgang decides to go in terms of which edition to support, but I think that KQ in its present form is an amazing publication and I think it has a long life ahead of it.

 

[Erik Mona]

Ahh the time I liked it the least.

Aww, thanks, Vic!

--Erik

 

[MichaelSomething]

Thanks but I meant to ask how Mona-era Dragon is different from the earlier Dragon magizines. It is better written? Which one has better art? If early Dragon was a shotgun, would Mona-era Dragon be a machine gun? I guess I'm asking about the style and feel of each.

 

[VictorC]

Aww, thanks, Vic!

--Erik

Truth hurts.

 

[Herremann the Wise]

Truth hurts.

Your opinion you mean.
It might, but most probably won't.

Many regard Erik's tenure as completely revitalizing the magazine.

Best Regards
Herremann the Wise

 

[Scribble]

I'm not sure if I agree it needs to go one way or the other.

I remember back in the day Dragon had stuff for games other then D&D, and even though I never played those games sometimes it inspired me to find a way to use it in D&D (or a D&D form...) or made me want to check out the game in question.