Jack7
First Post
The only one who said they had visited him was "Mandy", who turned out to be an account that Reveille created just for the hoax.
That's good then.
No sense involving others in the scheme.
The only one who said they had visited him was "Mandy", who turned out to be an account that Reveille created just for the hoax.
Yes, we did. However, we will not engage in a "telephone game" here, especially when we clearly disagree on whether it was appropriate. If you want to know his side of the story, you'll have to ask him.
Similarly, no, we are not going to discuss how we caught him.
Trying to figure out his motives, Wasn't it Reveille who ran a social experiment (not as crude) a few years back that upset everyone because it wasn't based on a real situation. For some reason i remember it being d and d related but delving into serious moral issues.
I think everyone needs to step back and breath a little. Rev was a valued member of our community for YEARS before he did this. Sure he may have tarnished his reputation in a huge way, but he shouldn't be perma-banned for one lapse of judgment.
If anything you should look at what he did in this way: He showed each and everyone of use how fragile this digital existance truly is. He made us realize that if something happened to one of us it would truly difficult for anyone to know because it is easy to fabricate lies on the internet. He also showed that having purely textual relationships over a digital network is foolish since it is difficult because how much information and disinformation exists. He tought us a valid and much needed lesson, so don't damn him because you didn't get the "harr-harr" or because you felt hurt/deceived by his cry for help.
If anyone on ENWorld deserves a second chance, it's Rev.
The part that ticks me off the most is that when something like this happens, it takes the trust that a community has in one or more of its members who have met each other in person, gamed with them, fellowshipped with them, and smashes it. [. . . ]
It just adds one more barrier of distrust to a community that I otherwise consider to be a pretty friendly group of people.
This.Personally, I'm happy to approach any reports of problems from community members in good faith in the first instance, and will continue to do so. It may mean that sometimes I'll get suckered, but I'd rather that happen than that I fail to offer condolences and prayers for those who are in need.